A Canadian TV show about gay hockey players has made brand-new hockey fans out of queer people who never cared about the sport before. “How Heated Rivalry Imagines a More Inclusive NHL” imagines it all going further, with an NHL star coming out in public and naming the show as his reason.
The article’s central claim is that the Crave series, picked up by HBO for US rights at the end of 2025, has turned gay audiences into hockey fans around the world — the United Kingdom, Australia, and even Russia.
The Fantasy Scenario
The piece opens with a staged scene: a top NHL player, his agent, and the rest of the team’s leadership gathering for a press conference. The player has decided to come out publicly, saying he’s “a Stanley Cup champion who just happens to be gay.”
The agent has just finished telling everyone how long the player thought about this day, while the coach, general manager, and team owner wait at the podium. The player walks in, smiles, and says his piece.
The trigger, according to the scene, was the fifth episode of Heated Rivalry, where a character named Scott Hunter wins the Cup and then brings his same-sex lover down to the ice to kiss in front of everyone in the arena.
“I have a partner too—he’s right there at the back of the room, I’ll introduce you afterward—and I just thought, life is too short. I’ve achieved everything in hockey there is to achieve, and I just want to be happy in every part of my life. I want to be like Scott Hunter. So here I am.”
The Back Story
The story opens by noting that no such thing has happened. The secrets of closeted gay NHL players are safe for now, as of this writing.
The article then turns to a real-life quote from Georges Laraque, a former NHL enforcer, who said a gay player could not come out within the next five or even ten years. “It’s impossible for a gay hockey player to come out within the next five or even ten years; the media attention would be too distracting for the whole organization, he’d never survive,” Laraque said.
The piece does not argue with this claim. It simply sets the scene for what the show has achieved.
The TV Show’s Reach
“Are you ready?” the article begins, with a sports agent preparing his client, one of the NHL’s biggest stars, for a major announcement. The player shrugs and says yes, and the two walk down the hall of the arena.
The agent then tells the player that if there’s any reason to cancel the press conference, he should say it now. The player says no, that all his teammates and management support him, that he’s financially set for life, and that losing a few endorsement deals is nothing.
The coach, general manager, and team owner all await at the podium as the announcement begins.
The Queer Comedy That Came Before
The show’s success is compared to a 2007 Canadian comedy called Breakfast with Scot, which adapted a 1999 novel. The Maple Leafs approved the use of their logo and uniforms, and the film was a big deal at the time.
But the article argues that Breakfast with Scot hasn’t aged well. The film, directed by Laurie Lynd and produced by Paul Brown, Howard Rosenman, and Nadine Schiff, follows a gender-divergent adolescent named Scot who is placed in the care of his stepfather’s gay brother Sam, a retired Maple Leafs player turned TV sportscaster.
The film is completely sexless and one-dimensional, the article says. Scot’s self-confidence in genderqueer expression seems unrealistic for his age. Sam is too perfect. Eric, the closeted sportscaster, fades before his happy ending.
The article’s verdict on Breakfast with Scot is harsh: “There is nary a hint of true gayness in this film, which also happens to be completely sexless. And the characters are one-dimensional.”
The Show’s Actual Impact
The article’s core argument is that “Heated Rivalry as queer cultural hockey content blows away everything that came before it.” The show has made brand-new hockey fans out of queer people who were never interested in the sport before.
The article notes that the show’s success has caught on “like wildfire internationally at the end of 2025.”
The article frames the show’s success as a cultural shift rather than a sports one. The show has changed how queer audiences think about hockey, making them fans of a sport they never cared about before.
The Player’s Decision
The scenario ends with the player’s announcement. The flashes go off. The hands go up. The first question is the most obvious: After all this time in the closet, what finally prompted him to come out?
The player’s answer points directly at the show. He cites the fifth episode, where Scott Hunter wins the Cup and brings his lover down to the ice to kiss in front of everyone.
The player’s reasoning is simple: life is too short. He’s achieved everything in hockey there is to achieve, and he just wants to be happy in every part of his life. He wants to be like Scott Hunter.
The agent smiles and says he can’t argue with that. The media event begins with the GM introducing the agent, who tells everyone how long his client has been thinking about this day. Then it’s the player’s turn.
The Limits of the Story
The article is careful to note that its scenario is just a fantasy. Nothing has happened yet because of the show or any other factor.
The secrets of closeted gay NHL players are safe for now. The conversation about homosexuality in the last major professional sports league in North America without an openly gay player has been reignited, but the players themselves have not followed.
The article’s argument is that the show has created a cultural moment. It has made brand-new hockey fans out of queer folk who were never interested in the sport before.
The show has done so as far away as the United Kingdom, Australia, and even homophobic Russia. That reach is the story’s central claim, and the article rests on it.
Reading the Story
The piece is a direct argument. It says the show has changed how queer audiences think about hockey, and it backs that up with the fantasy of a player coming out because of it.
The story’s honesty is in its framing. It is a fantasy, and it knows it.
The article’s tone is wry. It sets up a scene of a player, his agent, and his team all cheering him on before the media — a hilarious mirror of real sports PR.
The article’s argument is that the show has created a cultural moment. It has made brand-new hockey fans out of queer folk who were never interested in the sport before.
The show has done so as far away as the United Kingdom, Australia, and even homophobic Russia. That reach is the story’s central claim, and the article rests on it.
| Episode | Character | Event |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Scot | Introduced |
| 5 | Scott Hunter | Wins the Cup and kisses his lover on the ice |
| — | Player | Cites the episode as his reason for coming out |
The fantasy is the point. The player’s decision to come out publicly is a direct response to the show’s cultural moment. The article is making a case for what the show has already done, and for what it might yet do.
The article’s argument is that the show has created a cultural moment. It has made brand-new hockey fans out of queer folk who were never interested in the sport before.
The show has done so as far away as the United Kingdom, Australia, and even homophobic Russia. That reach is the story’s central claim, and the article rests on it.
Source material: “How Heated Rivalry Imagines a More Inclusive NHL,” Literary Hub.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.