Midterms 2026See who we think should earn your vote, based on our standardsThe guide →
WRITTEN IN PLAIN AMERICAN ENGLISH.
CLAY TRIBUNE.
Advertisement

Man Utd borrow £90m more, pushing club debt past £1.1bn

Man Utd borrow another £90m, pushing debt past £1.1bn. Where did the extra £38.7m go? The club won't explain.

By mitch·3 min read
A shadowy football stadium under dark clouds at night.

Manchester United have borrowed another £90m since 30 June, pushing their total debt past £1.1bn. The club confirmed they spent £191.7m on new players this summer, and the numbers don’t quite add up.

United bought Andrey Santos from Chelsea on 13 July, Youri Tielemans from Aston Villa on 14 July and Carlos Baleba from Brighton on 25 August. The fees the club stated at the time added up to £153m. The difference between that figure and the £191.7m confirmed later is not explained.

The Three Transfers

Here’s what each deal involved:

Advertisement
  • Andrey Santos, bought from Chelsea on 13 July
  • Youri Tielemans, bought from Aston Villa on 14 July
  • Carlos Baleba, bought from Brighton on 25 August

The club confirmed three further drawdowns from its revolving credit limit, on 29 and 31 July and 28 August, totalling £120m. It then paid back £30m on 21 September.

The Numbers Behind the Debt

The £90m borrowing was included in a more detailed filing to the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday, following Wednesday’s release of their 2025-26 accounts to 30 June. Despite major cost-cutting measures implemented by Sir Jim Ratcliffe since he became minority owner in 2024, United’s overall debt is still more than £1bn.

Component Amount
Historic debt £578m
Revolving credit outstanding £200m
Outstanding transfer fees £375m
Total debt £1.15bn

What the Club Owe

The club say payments for their most recent transfers “are due within the next five years”. That is a large commitment, especially given the timing of the remaining debts.

Period Amount due
Within one to two years £104.8m
Within two to five years £51.9m
Next 12 months Remainder

The Difference Between Fees

The £191.7m spent on new players this summer exceeds the £153m the club stated at the time of each transfer. Where the additional £38.7m went is not clear.

The club have been approached for comment.

The Cost-Cutting Question

Sir Jim Ratcliffe took a minority stake in United in 2024 and has since pushed through major cost-cutting measures. Those efforts have reduced the amount owed in transfer fees by £72m, down from £447m in the 2024-25 accounts.

But the reduction is offset by fresh borrowing, and the debt remains stubbornly high.

What We Know

The key facts are simple to state and harder to reconcile:

  1. United borrowed £90m since 30 June
  2. They spent £191.7m on new players this summer
  3. The stated fees at the time of each transfer totalled £153m
  4. The difference between those figures is not explained
  5. The club have been approached for comment

Our View

This is a club borrowing heavily to fund a summer spending spree, while its debt remains stubbornly high despite Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s cost-cutting measures. The gap between stated fees and actual spend is notable, and the club have not yet offered an explanation for it.

The numbers are large, the commitments are long, and the question of where the extra money went remains open.

Source material: “Man Utd borrow another £90m as debt tops £1.1bn,” the BBC.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.