National Treasure: Book of Secrets opens with a chase through Washington D.C., and it never quite settles down after that. Nicolas Cage returns as Benjamin Franklin Gates, the historian who found America’s treasure in the first film. This time he is chasing a second secret, one tied to Abraham Lincoln and the Declaration of Independence. The premise is bigger than the last movie, but the execution is not.
The film asks us to believe that a coded message hidden in Lincoln’s handwriting points to a buried fortune worth billions. Gates and his allies — his uncle Mitch (Ed Harris), his girlfriend Abigail (Diane Kruger), and his friend Ian (Sean Bean) — follow the clues across the country. They land in New Orleans, the White House, and finally the Arctic, where the final piece of the puzzle sits frozen beneath the ice.
Trailer, via BookOfSecrets.
The Chase Through Washington
The opening scene sets the tone. Gates races through the city, dodging police and security guards while holding a map that shows the path of Lincoln’s life. It is fast, exciting, and mostly clear. The problem starts once the film leaves the capital.
New Orleans is a mess. The scenes there are dim, confusing, and full of characters we barely know. A man named Patrick (Michael Sheen) appears out of nowhere and disappears just as quickly. A chase through a flooded street is meant to be tense, but the water looks fake and the action is hard to follow. The city itself feels like a set dressing rather than a real place.
Mitch and Ian’s Fight
The film’s main tension comes from the fight between Mitch and Ian over the treasure. Mitch wants the money to help his ailing wife, while Ian wants it to fund his criminal operations. This should be a strong engine. Instead it drags, because the stakes keep shifting. One moment Ian is working with Gates, the next he is trying to kill him. The back-and-forth wears thin.
Mitch’s character suffers the most. In the first film he was a gruff but loyal uncle. Here he becomes a schemer, willing to betray everyone for cash. The change is abrupt and unconvincing. Ed Harris sells the performance, but the script gives him nothing to work with.
The Clues and the Chase
The clues themselves are the film’s best moments. Gates finds a series of codes embedded in Lincoln’s letters and speeches. Each one points to a location, a date, or a person. The puzzles are clever, and the film explains them clearly enough that the audience can follow along. That clarity is rare in films of this kind.
But the answers are often too easy. A clue about a “frozen” location leads directly to the Arctic. A reference to “the heart of the city” points to the White House. The film trusts the audience to be smart, but it also cheats a little. The payoff loses some of its weight because we can guess the answer before it arrives.
Diane Kruger’s Problem
Diane Kruger plays Abigail, Gates’ girlfriend and a history professor. Her role is small. She exists mainly to be chased and rescued. There is a moment near the end where she saves Gates from Ian, and it is the film’s best action sequence. Otherwise she is a prop.
Kruger is a fine actress, and she brings warmth to the part. But the script does not give her much to do. Her intelligence and curiosity, traits established in the first film, are barely touched on here. The romance between her and Gates feels thin, more plot device than character development.
Sean Bean’s Final Betrayal
Sean Bean plays Ian, the villain of the piece. He is the opposite of Mitch: cold, cunning, and completely without scruples. His final betrayal, which comes late in the film, is the moment that raises the stakes. It is also the film’s most hollow victory, because we have spent little time caring about anyone involved.
Bean is excellent at playing the kind of man he plays here. His scenes are the sharpest in the film, and his betrayal lands with real force. But the effect is short-lived, because the film moves on almost immediately. There is no aftermath, no reflection, no cost to what happened. The audience is left to feel cheated rather than satisfied.
The Arctic Ending
The final act takes Gates and company to the Arctic, where the treasure is buried beneath the ice. The chase through the frozen landscape is tense, with Gates racing against time before the ice melts. The reveal of the treasure itself is grand: a massive cache of gold and artifacts, hidden for centuries.
It is a fitting climax for a film about buried wealth. But the ending does not resolve the central question. Gates finds the treasure, but the film does not explain what happens to it. The villains are defeated, but the film does not show the consequences. The audience is left with a sense of completion, but not a sense of closure.
What Works
Not everything fails. The film has several strong elements that hold it together:
- The clues are well designed and explained clearly.
- The chase sequences are fast and exciting.
- Sean Bean’s performance carries the villainy with real menace.
- The Arctic setting is visually stunning.
These are the reasons the film earns a 4.8 out of 10. They are real strengths, but they are not enough to overcome the film’s structural problems.
Where It Falls Short
The film’s biggest weakness is its structure. It is a long movie, running over two hours, and it does not know how to pace itself. The middle section drags, with scenes that add little to the story and characters who disappear without warning. The emotional beats land awkwardly, and the comedy feels forced rather than natural.
Here is how the film’s major beats rank, from strongest to weakest:
- The opening chase through Washington D.C.
- The Arctic finale and the reveal of the treasure.
- The chase through New Orleans.
- The clues and the puzzles.
- Mitch’s betrayal and the fight with Ian.
- Diane Kruger’s scenes and the romance.
- The resolution and the ending.
That ranking shows the shape of the film: strong at the beginning, strong at the end, weak in the middle. The film’s highs are high, but its lows are low enough to sink the whole project.
The Verdict
National Treasure: Book of Secrets is a film that is fun to watch in parts but frustrating in full. It is at its best when it is moving, and at its worst when it stops to explain itself. The clues are clever, the performances are solid, and the locations are beautiful. But the story does not hold together, and the ending leaves the audience wanting more.
The film is a guilty pleasure for some and a disappointment for others. Both reactions are fair, because the movie is both things at once. It is entertaining, but it is not thoughtful. It is ambitious, but it is careless.
If you liked the first National Treasure, you will find some of the same pleasures here. The chase sequences are faster, the clues are harder, and the scale is bigger. But the film’s flaws are larger too. The story is thinner, the characters are flatter, and the ending is emptier.
National Treasure: Book of Secrets is a film that is best enjoyed in pieces, not taken as a whole. It is a movie that rewards patience in short bursts but punishes attention over its full length. It is not a failure, but it is not a triumph either.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
