The College Football Playoff has a new problem: the SEC’s nine-game schedule, and nobody is sure the fix will stick. The Playoff has added a metric to measure conference strength within each league, a change entering its third year of the 12-team format. The SEC wants the world to see its schedule as a burden, not a gift. The metric is the committee’s attempt to answer that complaint.
The Metric’s New Format
The metric already existed. Now it gets more attention. The Playoff will present the data in a new format, with deeper emphasis on schedule strength differences within a single league. The idea is simple: when comparing two similar teams, the metric should help explain why one conference’s record looks stronger than another’s.
Megaconferences with at least 16 teams create wide disparities in final records due to varied scheduling strength. Duke reached the ACC Championship Game after playing only one ranked opponent — one team in the AP Top 25. Texas Tech is in a similar position in 2026 after beating No. 25 Houston, the only ranked team on its schedule.
The SEC’s Schedule Problem
The SEC plays nine conference games per season. That is the source of the complaint. The metric is meant to capture how tough a conference schedule was, including teams within the same league. For a nine-game league, that means measuring the difference between playing a slate of ranked teams and playing one or two.
Notre Dame faces a stranger problem. It plays no conference schedule and must be evaluated as an at-large. The metric is strange for the Fighting Irish, who exist outside the conference structure entirely.
The SEC’s coaches made their feelings clear during the offseason. CFP staff met with SEC coaches at spring meetings, and the meeting was unexpectedly tense. Kirby Smart told CBS Sports he is not blaming the committee but the system, saying, “Now, you could say there may be regret in there going to nine… I’m not blaming the committee, I’m blaming the system, because I don’t know that they can recognize and acknowledge, truly, and say strength of schedule matters and you’re putting a team with one more loss in their column over a team that might have one less and they play the same schedule.”
Last Season’s Numbers
Four of the seven at-large selections last season went to SEC schools. The SEC failed to win a single College Football Playoff game against an opponent from another Power Four league last season. Those numbers are the SEC’s argument in its purest form: the league sends teams to the Playoff, but those teams lose.
SEC coaches expressed anger that Big 12 member BYU — which did not make the playoff — finished ahead of Texas and Vanderbilt in the rankings. BYU was several spots ahead of both SEC schools in the most commonly cited strength-of-record metric. BYU had one fewer regular-season loss than Vanderbilt and two fewer than Texas. BYU picked up a second loss in the Big 12 Championship Game.
The numbers are not close. The SEC’s complaint is not abstract. It is a matter of record.
What the Metric Actually Does
The metric helps contextualize conference power when comparing two similar teams. It measures how tough a conference schedule was, including teams within the same league. Strength of schedule, head-to-head competition and outcomes against common opponents retain their importance this year.
The question is whether the metric changes anything. It is unclear if the metric will have much real-world impact since strength of schedule was already a meaningful data point considered in the process. The metric is strange for Notre Dame, which plays no conference schedule and must be evaluated as an at-large.
The metric is a response to that tension, not a solution to it. The SEC’s complaint is simple: the league’s schedule is different from everyone else’s. The metric is meant to account for that difference. Whether it does is unclear.
The metric is the answer to a question the SEC asked. Whether it answers the question well enough remains to be seen.
Key facts:
– The metric enters its third year of the 12-team CFP
– Four of seven at-large selections last season went to SEC schools
– BYU finished ahead of Texas and Vanderbilt in the rankings
– BYU had one fewer regular-season loss than Vanderbilt and two fewer than Texas
What the metric measures:
– Conference strength within a single league
– Schedule strength differences within a league
– Strength of schedule, head-to-head competition and outcomes against common opponents
Where the paper stands
The paper backs the small schools against the SEC’s push for a nine-game schedule and the Playoff’s new metric, which may end up helping the biggest conferences most. The metric is a response to the SEC’s complaint, but it does not address the underlying problem: the SEC’s own decision to play nine conference games creates a schedule that is unlike anyone else’s. The SEC wants the world to see its schedule as a burden, not a gift — and the metric, far from settling the complaint, merely formalizes the comparison.
The metric measures conference strength within a single league, but it cannot change the fact that the SEC chose a schedule structure that leaves its teams playing fewer ranked opponents than most other leagues. The SEC’s coaches made their feelings clear during the offseason, and the meeting with CFP staff was unexpectedly tense. Kirby Smart blamed the system, not the committee, and his point holds: the committee cannot acknowledge what the SEC itself chose.
The metric enters its third year of the 12-team format, and the Playoff will present the data in a new format with deeper emphasis on schedule strength differences within a single league. The SEC’s complaint is not abstract: four of seven at-large selections last season went to SEC schools, and the SEC failed to win a single College Football Playoff game against an opponent from another Power Four league. Those numbers are the SEC’s argument in its purest form, and they show the problem the metric is meant to address.
Source material: “College Football Playoff enhances metric to evaluate conference strength amid SEC scheduling concerns,” CBS Sports.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.