SpaceX has spent years turning a tangle of pipes and wires into a sleek, streamlined rocket engine. The Raptor engine first fired in 2016, flew on Starhopper in 2019, and reached full Starship duty in 2023. Its latest version, the Raptor 3, showed off in May of this year. The transformation is so dramatic that many people initially doubted it was real.
The engine’s evolution follows a clear path:
- The Raptor 1, a tangle of pipes and wires.
- The Raptor 3, the sleek, streamlined engine on the right.
How the Raptor Engine Works
The Raptor is a “full-flow staged combustion” engine. It throws mass out of a rocket nozzle, pushing the rocket in the opposite direction. The more mass thrown, and the faster it goes, the more thrust the engine produces.
The simplest rocket is a cold gas thruster. It vents pressurized gas to push a spacecraft. NASA’s Manned Maneuvering Unit uses this kind of engine. The Falcon 9’s control thrusters are similar.
Cold gas thrusters are simple and reliable, but they top out fast. To get more thrust, you burn two propellants together in a combustion chamber. That adds the energy stored in chemical bonds to the mix.
The Pressure Problem
Burning fuel and oxidizer creates hot gas that wants to flow back into the fuel and oxidizer lines. To stop that, the pressure in the combustion chamber has to be lower than the pressure in the tanks. Storing propellants at ever-higher pressure gets impractical fast — the tanks and lines grow thick and heavy.
Instead, you store propellants at low pressure and feed them through a pump that raises the pressure before they reach the combustion chamber. Every large booster rocket uses this method.
The Turbopump Power Problem
Pumps that handle this volume of fluid need huge amounts of power. The turbopump on the F-1 engine, used on the Saturn V, required around 41 megawatts of power. That is slightly less than the power the S8G nuclear reactor delivers to the propeller shaft of an Ohio-class submarine.
One way to supply that power is with a battery. Rocket Lab’s Electron rocket has an engine with a battery-powered electric pump. But most large rockets use their own propellant as a power source, burning a small amount of fuel and oxidizer to drive a turbine that drives the pump.
The Gas Generator Cycle
The simplest arrangement sends a small amount of fuel and oxidizer to a turbine, then vents the exhaust. This is called a gas generator cycle. It powers the F-1 engine and SpaceX’s Merlin engine.
The Staged Combustion Path
Another option burns some fuel and oxidizer to drive the pump, then routes the burned propellant through the main combustion chamber along with the unburned fuel and oxidizer. This is staged combustion. The smaller combustion chamber used to drive the pumps is called the preburner.
This is more complex than a gas generator cycle, but it is more efficient. The burned propellant feeds directly into the main chamber rather than being wasted.
The Full-Flow Design
The Raptor uses full-flow staged combustion. In this setup, both the fuel and oxidizer pass through the preburner before reaching the main combustion chamber. Nothing is vented away.
That approach requires precise timing and control. The fuel and oxidizer must meet at the right moment in the preburner, and the whole system has to stay stable under extreme heat and pressure.
The Performance Gain
The Raptor 3 provides about 35% more thrust than the Raptor 1.
The Skeptics
Tory Bruno, then-CEO of space launch company United Launch Alliance, tweeted that there was “no need to exaggerate this by showing a partially assembled engine.” SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell responded with a picture of the Raptor 3 firing successfully.
The exchange shows how dramatic the change looked to outside observers.
What Changed
SpaceX does not publish official Raptor schematics, and no one has done a teardown of the engine. But Elon Musk has commented on the design occasionally, and fans have speculated about the major changes.
The evolution from Raptor 1 to Raptor 3 involved streamlining the turbomachinery, improving the combustion chamber, and refining the full-flow staged combustion cycle. Each step made the engine more efficient and more powerful.
The result is an engine that looks nothing like its early prototypes. The Raptor 3 is clean, smooth, and built on a design that continues to evolve.
The Bottom Line
The Raptor engine’s journey from a tangle of pipes to a sleek powerhouse is a remarkable example of engineering progress. SpaceX took a complex system and improved it.
The 35% thrust gain is part of that improvement. The skepticism from outside observers is understandable. But the Raptor 3 has shown what it can do, and it represents the current state of the design.
| Stage | Milestone | Date |
|---|---|---|
| First test-fire | Raptor engine tested | 2016 |
| First flight | Starhopper | 2019 |
| Full Starship duty | Starship stack | 2023 |
| Latest version | Raptor 3 | May of this year |
The table shows the engine’s timeline, from first test to its current form. Each step brought the engine closer to its final shape.
Source material: “How SpaceX streamlined the Raptor engine,” construction-physics.com.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.