The Chronicles of Riddick is a film about a man who has nothing left to lose. It is also a film that seems determined to make that premise last two hours longer than it should.
The movie opens with Riddick (Vin Diesel) escaping a prison transport. He lands on a desolate planet, hunted by a mercenary named Jackman (Collin Farrel), and allies with a group of mercenaries led by Meru (Kateb Balagh). The plot is simple: Riddick wants to get off the planet, the others want him dead, and a corrupt official named Reaver (Jeremy Davies) is pulling strings from orbit. That simplicity is the problem.
Trailer, via Universal Pictures At Home.
Vin Diesel Carries the Weight
Vin Diesel plays Riddick as a man who has been beaten down by life but still moves with a quiet menace. His performance is the best thing in the film, and it carries scenes that otherwise collapse under the script’s insistence on exposition. The character’s backstory is revealed through flashbacks and dialogue, but Diesel sells the pain and the resolve.
Collin Farrel plays Jackman as a hunter who respects his prey. Their scenes together are tense, and the chemistry between them is the film’s strongest asset. Kateb Balagh rounds out the group as Meru, the leader of the mercenaries who initially wants Riddick alive for his skills but eventually comes to see him as a threat. The supporting cast is competent, but they are often buried under the film’s cluttered plotting.
Darkness Is Not Style
The film is shot in dark, moody lighting, which is meant to evoke Riddick’s world. It mostly succeeds in making the screen difficult to read. Action scenes are hard to follow, and the film’s attempts to build tension through darkness often feel like a trick rather than a choice. The visuals are striking, but they serve the story poorly.
Jeremy Davies plays Reaver as a weasely bureaucrat who cares more about profit than justice. His scenes are the film’s weakest link, and his motivations are never fully explained. The film leans on the idea that he is a corrupt official, but it never gives him a reason beyond greed. This is a missed opportunity, since Reaver could have been a compelling antagonist.
Where the Plot Falls Apart
The film’s middle section drags. Characters talk at each other about things that were established minutes earlier, and the pacing slows to a crawl. The climax, when it finally arrives, feels rushed after so much setup. The final confrontation between Riddick and Jackman is the highlight of the film, but it is over almost as soon as it begins.
The film’s attempt to explain the universe of the series through flashbacks and voiceovers is clumsy. It is as if the filmmakers were unsure whether viewers had seen the previous installment and decided to cover all bases anyway. This results in a film that spends too much time telling and not enough time showing.
A Solid Foundation, A Shaky Finish
The Chronicles of Riddick has a strong premise and a talented lead actor. It fails to live up to either. The plot is convoluted, the pacing is uneven, and the ending feels rushed. The film is not a disaster, but it is a disappointment.
The film’s legacy is mixed. It spawned a sequel, but that sequel has been largely forgotten. The film itself has become a footnote in the careers of its stars. That is a shame, because there is a good movie buried under the excess here. It just never quite gets dug up.
The film’s failure is not a failure of ambition. It is a failure of execution. The ideas are there, but the writing and direction cannot support them.
The Verdict
The Chronicles of Riddick is a flawed but watchable entry in a franchise. It has a strong lead performance and a few tense moments, but it is weighed down by a plot that refuses to breathe. It is not a bad film, but it is not a good one either. It is a film that tries to do too much with too little.
The film earns a score of 3.8 out of 10.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
