Donald Trump has spent decades telling stories to sell himself. From real estate tycoon to tabloid subject to reality TV star to US president, he has always leaned on narrative over numbers. Now, with six weeks to go before the US midterm elections, he is doing the same thing again — except this time the stakes are political, not commercial, and the story he is selling is increasingly detached from reality.
Trump’s latest move came last Friday, when he barred CNN, MS Now, and Politico from the White House over their coverage. The outlets promptly filed lawsuits challenging the decision. A federal judge ordered Trump to restore access to the three networks.
The Judge’s Order
Trump told CNN at the UN, “You said you weren’t going to cover me,” though the outlet never said that; he added, “You shouldn’t be covering me.” The judge’s order restored access regardless of his words.
Control of the Message
Trump’s career has been built on control of the message. He speaks for extended periods without interruption, sometimes for multiple hours. He launched his own social network, Truth Social, after being banned from other platforms. His administration recently created a YouTube channel, which critics called a “state-run” TV network.
The pattern is consistent. When he cannot control the conversation, he changes the platform. When he cannot change the platform, he bans the people asking questions. The result is a media environment where the president speaks only to audiences that agree with him, and reporters who disagree face exclusion or legal action.
The Iran War and the Golden Age
Trump’s current narrative includes two contradictory threads. The Iran war began in February and has lasted more than 200 days. He has also claimed that tariffs are enriching the US economy and that a “golden age” is underway.
Both cannot be true at once. A war running for nearly seven months is a costly enterprise. Tariffs raise prices for consumers and businesses alike. A golden age requires growth and prosperity; neither war nor tariffs deliver those things reliably.
Polls show Democrats hold an edge on the generic ballot and in some Senate contests. Trump’s party faces a potential “bloodbath” in November’s midterms. The narrative machine is working overtime to counter that reality.
The Free Press Problem
At July’s White House correspondents’ dinner, Trump said he believed in the free press more than anyone in the room and then said “Hmm.” He added, “Maybe not quite.” That moment captured the tension between his stated beliefs and his actions.
He has sued the Wall Street Journal, the BBC, and CBS over coverage. Those lawsuits remain pending. He banned CNN, MS Now, and Politico from the White House. The pattern is clear: when the press reports inconvenient truths, Trump responds with lawsuits and exclusions.
The irony is that the free press is precisely what Trump’s narrative depends on. Without journalists asking questions, his stories cannot be tested against reality. Without journalists covering his rallies, his crowds look smaller.
The Midterm Convention
The Republican Party held its first-ever midterm convention in Dallas. Trump asked supporters to pretend they were voting for him, though his name will not appear on any ballot. The request is a reminder that the party’s future depends on turnout, not on loyalty to a candidate.
Brandon Herrera, a 30-year-old YouTuber with over 4 million subscribers and a frontrunner for Texas’s 23rd congressional district, has made inflammatory pro-gun comments. His rise reflects the party’s embrace of online personalities over traditional candidates.
Twenty-three people died in a 2019 Walmart mass shooting in that district. An 18-year-old former student killed 19 children and two teachers in the Uvalde school shooting. The district’s history is one of tragedy, not triumph.
The Anger on the Ground
Maurice Mitchell, national director of the Working Families party, said, “Most people around the country… are 10 out of 10 pissed off, angry and willing to take that anger into action against the status quo.”
That anger is real. It is also being channeled by politicians who have nothing to lose. Trump’s party is facing a potential bloodbath in November. The convention in Dallas was a bid to energize the base. The question is whether the base shows up.
Comparing the Narratives
| Thread | Trump’s Account | Reality |
|---|---|---|
| Iran war | Costly and unpopular | Ongoing conflict |
| Tariffs | Enriching the economy | Higher prices |
| Golden age | A period of prosperity | Mixed economic signals |
| Midterms | Strong Republican chances | Democratic edge in polls |
The table shows the gap between what Trump says and what the numbers show. The gap is growing, not shrinking.
What Happens Next
The midterms are six weeks away. Trump will continue telling his stories. The question is whether voters believe them.
The paper has a view. The concentration of power in one executive voice runs contrary to the principles of a free press and a responsive democracy. When one person controls the narrative, the public loses access to competing voices. When one person attacks the press, the public loses access to scrutiny.
The pattern is not new. Trump has spent decades practicing it. The difference now is that the consequences are political, not commercial. A bad deal can be walked away from. A bad election result cannot be undone.
The lawsuits remain pending. The war continues. The midterms approach. The stories will keep coming.
The paper believes in a free press. It believes in a responsive democracy. It believes that voters deserve to hear from a range of voices, not just one. It believes that the truth is best served by scrutiny, not by control.
The midterms will test whether the narrative holds. The paper will report the results.
Where the paper stands
The paper backs the judge’s order restoring access for CNN, MS Now, and Politico and is against Trump’s attempt to ban the outlets based on their coverage. The pattern is clear: when the press reports inconvenient truths, Trump responds with lawsuits and exclusions. That runs contrary to the principles of a free press and a responsive democracy.
The paper supports decisions that push power back toward citizens and away from Washington. A single executive voice controlling the narrative leaves the public with no competing voices to weigh against it. When one person attacks the press, the public loses scrutiny altogether.
The lawsuits remain pending. The war continues. The midterms approach. The stories will keep coming. The paper will report the results.
Key Facts Box
- Trump banned CNN, MS Now, and Politico from the White House on Friday
- A federal judge ordered access restored to the three networks
- The Iran war began in February and has lasted more than 200 days
- Polls show Democrats hold an edge on the generic ballot and in some Senate contests
- Brandon Herrera has over 4 million YouTube subscribers and is a frontrunner for Texas’s 23rd congressional district
- Twenty-three people died in a 2019 Walmart mass shooting in that district; an 18-year-old former student killed 19 children and two teachers in the Uvalde school shooting
Source material: “When Trump’s narrative meets voters’ realities,” The Guardian.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.