President Xi Jinping arrived in the United States for summits with Donald Trump and got a warm welcome, complete with a personal airport greeting and a state banquet featuring sesame crusted sea bass and braised baby bok choy. But the Chinese leader did not get everything he wanted.
The two men discussed trade, technology, Taiwan, and artificial intelligence. The atmospherics were friendly, but the substance was often missing. Xi’s wish list included a year-long extension of a tariff truce, a permanent resolution on rare earths and US chip access, and a clearer signal from Trump on arms sales to Taiwan. He got some of it, but the rest got pushed into future rounds of talks.
Xi’s Welcome in Atlanta
Xi’s arrival in Atlanta was a spectacle. He was greeted personally at the airport, then moved through a state banquet where the menu featured sesame crusted sea bass and braised baby bok choy. The welcome was red-carpet level, designed to show mutual respect between the two leaders.
The hospitality did not translate into concessions. Xi came seeking concrete agreements on several fronts, and the US responded with a mix of partial wins and deferrals.
The Tariff Truce Got Shorter, Not Longer
One of Xi’s key goals was a year-long extension of a tariff truce. The US agreed to extend the truce, but only a few months. The pause, which had been set to expire in November, was pushed back to January. That is a few months, not a year.
The difference matters. A year-long extension would have locked in a period of reduced tension on trade. A few months buys time, but it also keeps the dispute unresolved. Both sides now face the same deadline again, and neither has committed to a longer-term solution.
Rare Earths, Chips, and Future Talks
The US and China are deeply entangled in each other’s economies. China controls much of the world’s production of rare earths, the elements used in:
- Smartphones
- Electric cars
- Wind turbines
- Medical equipment
The US wants better access to those materials. China wants assurances that US companies will not use them as leverage.
Both issues were raised during the talks, but neither was resolved. Instead, they were pushed into future rounds of negotiations. That means the dispute over rare earths and US chip access remains unresolved, with no timeline for a final settlement.
Taiwan: Xi’s Warning and Trump’s Response
Taiwan was always going to be the most sensitive topic. Xi has repeatedly warned that mishandling the issue could cause the two countries to “collide or even enter into conflict.” The warning came in May, and it set the stage for the summit.
During the talks, Xi likely argued that restraining support for Taiwan reduces the risk of conflict. The logic is simple: if the US cuts back on arms sales and diplomatic support for Taiwan, the chances of a military confrontation fall.
Trump responded with silence. He has faced bipartisan pressure to keep supporting Taiwan but has made no public response to Xi’s comments yet. Trump is not backing down, but he is also not escalating.
The gift of Ping Ping and Fu Shuang pandas was first heralded in April. Xi announced Thursday that they will arrive in a few days as China’s panda diplomacy resumes. The timing is notable: the pandas are arriving as the summit draws to a close, giving Xi a soft landing after a week of hard bargaining.
AI Talk Was Light on Decisions
The two leaders discussed artificial intelligence, but no concrete decisions emerged. Xi reiterated his hope that the US would adhere to the “correct position” of opposing Taiwan independence. Trump has dismissed extinction fears from AI as a “hoax.”
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published an essay calling for slower AI development to make it safer. A top safety researcher warned of a “greater than 10% chance” AI could cause human extinction. Trump’s dismissal of those fears as a “hoax” shows a gap between the two leaders on the urgency of the issue.
The two leaders will have tea and visit the national archives on Friday. That final day is ceremonial, not substantive.
The Economy Xi Is Facing
Xi’s domestic economy is in trouble. China is selling record amounts of goods globally, but consumer spending remains weak. Youth unemployment is staying high. Property prices are slumping in a country where 80% of people own their own homes.
Trade is helping prop up growth, making overseas market access more important than ever.
| Topic | Xi’s Position | Trump’s Response |
|---|---|---|
| Tariff truce | Year-long extension | Few months extension |
| Rare earths/chips | Resolve dispute | Push into future rounds |
| Taiwan arms sale | Restrict support | Delay approval, call it a “negotiating chip” |
| AI | Always under human control | Dismiss extinction fears as a “hoax” |
The pattern is consistent. Xi asks for a commitment, Trump offers a deferral.
What Xi Actually Got
The welcome was real. The state banquet was lavish. The pandas are coming. But the policy wins were modest. Xi got a shorter truce than he asked for, a promise to talk about rare earths later, and a silent response on Taiwan.
The US-China relationship is built on competing interests. China wants to be a superpower, and it wants the US to stay out of its way on trade, technology, and Taiwan. The US has its own priorities.
The summit did not resolve those tensions. It managed them temporarily. The two leaders spoke warmly, ate well, and left with a schedule of future talks.
The next deadline is January. By then, the US will have decided whether to approve the $14 billion arms package for Taiwan. Xi will have decided whether to extend the tariff truce beyond its new expiration date. The rare earths and chip access talks will still be pending.
The two leaders will meet again. The questions they asked in Atlanta remain unanswered.
Where the paper stands
The paper backs narrow rules against direct harm, such as forcing companies to disclose safety failures they hid, and is against broad rules that hand the market to the incumbents. The article notes that Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei called for slower AI development, while Trump dismissed extinction fears as a “hoax.” That contrast shows the danger of letting big tech hide its failures rather than facing them openly.
The paper opposes federal licensing of AI, because such rules freeze today’s leaders in place and lock out whoever would challenge them. The article’s section on AI shows the talks produced no concrete decisions, with Trump dismissing the warnings of a safety researcher who gave a specific probability figure for AI causing human extinction. That is the kind of direct harm the paper would force disclosure on, not a broad rule that hands the market to the incumbents.
Readers should watch for any sign that the US moves toward a licensing regime for AI, which would create a moat around the largest firms rather than exposing their actual performance. The paper’s position is clear: let the market compete freely, and punish companies that conceal safety failures.
Source material: “Xi got Trump's red carpet welcome – but not everything he wanted,” the BBC.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.