Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet turns Shakespeare’s tragedy into a modern Los Angeles crime story, casting Leonardo DiCaprio and Claire Danes as star-crossed teenagers from feuding gangs. The film trades Verona for Verona Beach, guns for swords, and MTV-style music for the Bard’s verse. The result is a bold, often striking reinvention that loses some of the original’s depth in the process.
DiCaprio plays Romeo as a lost soul who finds his purpose in love. Danes plays Juliet as a girl pushed into adulthood far too soon. Both performances are strong, and their chemistry carries scenes that would otherwise fall flat under the film’s constant visual noise. Their balcony scene, set to Aerosmith’s “You Were Always On My Mind,” is a highlight.
Trailer, via BAFTA.
The Verona Beach Problem
Luhrmann replaces the Montagues and Capulets with rival gangs, complete with graffiti and drive-by shootings. This works visually, but it flattens the play’s political and social context. The families’ feud in Shakespeare’s version has weight; the gangs’ war feels like a TV crime drama. The film also cuts large chunks of dialogue, replacing them with voiceover and song, which removes character development that the actors can’t make up through performance alone.
Music Over Meaning
The soundtrack, featuring tracks like “Kiss” and “Wicked Game,” is a mixed blessing. Some songs land perfectly, giving the film a pulse that Shakespeare’s text alone couldn’t provide. Others feel forced, turning moments of quiet reflection into club anthems. The film’s use of music is most successful when it complements the action rather than replacing it.
Technical Craft
Luhrmann’s direction is confident, and the production design is stunning. The film uses color and light to distinguish the Montague and Capulet worlds, with red and blue neon serving as visual shorthand for each gang. The fight scenes are choreographed with energy, and the final act’s tragic conclusion lands with real force despite the tonal shifts around it. The film’s ambition is visible in every frame, even when it doesn’t fully pay off.
A Tale of Two Versions
| Element | Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet | Luhrmann’s Romeo + Juliet |
|---|---|---|
| Setting | Verona, Italy | Los Angeles, present day |
| Language | Shakespearean verse | Modern dialogue and MTV-style narration |
| Feud | Family conflict over politics | Gang warfare over territory |
| Style | Classical tragedy | Modern, cinematic reinvention |
| Tone | Earnest and somber | Fast-paced, occasionally campy |
Where It Falls Short
The film’s biggest weakness is its inability to balance style with substance. Scenes that should build tension instead become spectacle, and characters who should feel fully realized remain shallow silhouettes. The film’s pace, while energetic, sometimes sacrifices clarity for velocity. Viewers who know the source material will notice plot elements that get dropped entirely, and those who don’t may miss the emotional stakes altogether.
The film also struggles with its own tonal shifts. It starts as a serious tragedy, drifts into a pop-music-infused romance, and ends with a grim, bloody conclusion. That range is ambitious, but it rarely coheres across the runtime.
Final Word
Romeo + Juliet is a visually striking, frequently engaging take on a classic tale. DiCaprio and Danes give performances that justify the experiment. But the film’s reliance on music, its altered setting, and its truncated script mean it never fully captures the depth of Shakespeare’s original. It is a bold attempt that mostly succeeds on its own terms, even when those terms diverge sharply from the Bard’s.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
