“Apocalypse: World War I” is a five-part documentary series that tries to do something simple but difficult: make century-old black-and-white war footage feel alive again by coloring it. The result is a show that is both a useful history lesson and a sometimes awkward one, carried by narration from Mathieu Kassovitz and directed by Isabelle Clarke and Daniel Costelle.
The series originally aired on Belgian Une (RTBF) from March 2, 2014, to March 16, 2014, before moving to France 2 from March 18, 2014, to April 1, 2014. It also ran on TV5 Québec Canada in May 2014. The episodes cover the war from its start to its end, tracing major battles and lesser-known fronts alike, from the Italian-Austrian conflict to the Ottoman Empire’s war against the Allies.
Trailer, via FrenchFilmFestNZ.
Colorizing the Footage
The core trick of “Apocalypse: World War I” is its colorization. Restored and tinted archive images replace the familiar grey scale of old war films, and the effect is immediate. Battles that once looked distant now look close. Corpses gain a sickly pallor. Mud takes on a deep brown hue. The series is careful to explain that this is restoration, not fabrication, and the footage comes from documents that were either known or previously unseen.
This is a smart approach. Color does not lie, but it can suggest things that were not there. The series handles that tension well, letting the images speak for themselves while Kassovitz’s voiceover provides context. The effect is most powerful in scenes showing soldiers in trenches, mud and water mixing with uniforms, and the scale of troop movements across wide fields.
“Colorized historical footage in ascending order of World War 1.”
Kassovitz’s Narration
Mathieu Kassovitz does the narration for the series. His delivery is steady and measured, though he sometimes leans into a dramatic tone that does not always match the matter-of-fact images on screen. He reads dates, casualty figures and strategic shifts with a calm that borders on monotony, which can work against the series when the visuals need to carry the weight.
Kassovitz is not a historian, and the show does not pretend otherwise. His role is to connect the images to the narrative thread, not to interpret them. That limits the value of his commentary, especially when the series covers unfamiliar fronts like the German-Polish-Russian theater or the Japanese-German conflict. Here the narration relies heavily on the footage itself, and when the images are strong enough, the narration fades into background noise.
The Forgotten Fronts
One of the stated goals of “Apocalypse: World War I” is to move beyond the familiar ground of the Western Front. The show devotes significant time to lesser-known conflicts, including the Italian-Austrian front, the German-Polish-Russian theater, the Japanese-German fight, the Ottoman Empire’s war against the Allies, and the battles fought in Africa’s German colonies. This is a genuine service to viewers who might otherwise assume the Great War was fought only in France and Belgium.
The problem is that the series often rushes through these stories. Episodes spend minutes establishing a new theater, then move on before the audience has time to grasp the stakes. The African theaters in particular get short shrift, reduced to quick montages rather than full narratives. The series acknowledges these fronts exist, but it does not always explain why they mattered, leaving the viewer with a list of names rather than a sense of consequence.
Structure and Pacing
The five episodes follow a chronological arc, starting with the war’s origins and ending with its conclusion. Each episode focuses on a specific phase of the conflict, and the pacing holds together across the full run. There is no wasted episode here, though some sections feel rushed and others feel padded. The series spends more time on the Western Front than on any other theater, which is understandable given the volume of existing footage, but it also means the lesser-known campaigns get short shrift.
The editing is clean and efficient. Transitions between scenes are smooth, and the series rarely loses its thread. It moves from one battle to the next without jarring cuts, which helps maintain the sense of a continuous war rather than a series of isolated engagements.
Where It Falls Short
“Apocalypse: World War I” is at its best when it lets the images breathe. At its worst, it leans too heavily on Kassovitz’s voiceover, and the pacing issues become more pronounced. The series is also limited by the quality of the original footage. Some sequences are sharp and vivid, while others remain grainy and faded, and the colorization cannot always rescue them.
The documentary also struggles with scale. The Great War was a global conflict, and trying to capture every front in five hours inevitably means some stories get short shrift. The Ottoman Empire’s war against the Allies, for example, is treated as a side note rather than a central part of the conflict. The African theaters receive even less attention, which is a missed opportunity given how much of the war’s fighting took place there.
Verdict
“Apocalypse: World War I” is a solid, if uneven, documentary. Its colorization is a technical achievement, and its ambition to cover the war’s lesser-known theaters is admirable. But the narration is sometimes flat, the pacing is inconsistent, and the series struggles to balance its many subjects. It is a valuable resource for anyone looking to understand the war’s full scope, but it is not the definitive account of the conflict.
The series earns a score of 7.7 out of 10.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
