Samuel Beckett once said that “nothing is more desolate than a human being who has nothing left.” That line sits at the heart of The Whale, Mike Binder’s 2022 adaptation of the Samuel D. Hunter play. Charlie Plummer stars as Charlie Cowling, a high school teacher dying from emphysema, who spends his final months holed up in his apartment, weighing 630 pounds, and refusing to get help. The film asks a simple question: what does it mean to love someone who has given up on themselves?
Binder directs with a heavy hand, and the result is a drama that feels less like a character study and more like a thesis on the nature of compassion. It is a well-intentioned film that struggles to find the nuance its subject demands. The script is built around a single idea, and that idea is hammered until the seams show.
Trailer, via A24.
Charlie Cowling’s Weight
Charlie is a man who has let himself fall apart. His apartment is a mess, his clothes barely fit, and he spends most of his time on the couch, watching TV and eating. He has stopped seeing friends, stopped answering calls, and stopped believing that anyone could want him alive. The film opens with a scene where he orders food online and watches it arrive, untouched, while he lies on the floor, gasping for air.
Plummer carries the weight of the role, both literally and figuratively. He moves through the film with a slow, deliberate grace that speaks to the exhaustion of living in a body that betrays him. The performance is physical as much as it is emotional, and it anchors a film that would otherwise drift aimlessly between scenes of despair and scenes of tenderness.
Arnie’s Visit
The film’s emotional center is Charlie’s relationship with his brother Arnie, played by Lucas Hedges. Arnie is a recovering addict, a former musician, and a man who has spent years trying to fix the family he left behind. He shows up at Charlie’s door unannounced, armed with a plan to get Charlie into rehab and back on his feet. What follows is a series of arguments, apologies, and quiet moments of connection that test both men’s resolve.
Hedges brings a raw energy to Arnie, a man who is desperate to save his brother and equally desperate to prove that he can be the one to do it. The chemistry between Plummer and Hedges is real, and it is the best thing about the film. Their scenes together are the ones that feel lived-in, honest, and full of a love that has survived years of neglect.
The Whale’s Cast
The supporting cast is solid, though they are mostly there to provide context rather than drive the story forward. Amy Schumer plays Peppy, Charlie’s former student and current friend, who has become his primary caregiver. She is warm, funny, and patient, but her role is largely defined by her devotion to Charlie, which can feel one-sided. Tim Blake Nelson appears as Charlie’s neighbor, a kind man who tries to offer comfort even as he recoils from the reality of Charlie’s condition.
The film also features a brief appearance from a young boy who becomes Charlie’s unexpected companion, though the boy’s presence is more symbolic than functional. He represents innocence and hope, but his scenes are thin and feel added rather than essential.
The Play vs. The Film
Hunter’s play was a critical success, and it earned comparisons to other dramas that explore the depths of human suffering. The film version attempts to translate that stagecraft to the screen, but it loses some of the intimacy that made the original work. A play can hold a single moment for minutes, letting the audience sit with the weight of a look or a silence. A film, by contrast, must keep moving, and that movement dilutes the impact.
| Element | Play | Film |
|---|---|---|
| Setting | One room | Expanded locations |
| Pace | Slower, deliberate | Faster, fragmented |
| Focus | Character psychology | Plot-driven narrative |
| Audience connection | Intimate | More distant |
The film adds a few new scenes and expands others, but the core structure remains the same. Charlie is isolated, Charlie receives visitors, Charlie refuses help, and Charlie ultimately faces the end of his life. The additions do not always serve the story; some feel like padding, others like filler.
The Whale’s Tone
Binder’s direction leans heavily on the tragic, and the film is often more mournful than it is hopeful. There are moments of levity, but they are few and far between. The film is at its best when it allows Charlie to be a whole person, warts and all, rather than a symbol of suffering. When it falls into sentimentality, it loses its power.
The film’s tone is uneven, shifting between moments of genuine feeling and moments that feel forced. There are scenes where the actors clearly know what they are doing and scenes where the script seems to be pulling them along by the arm. The film is at its weakest when it stops trusting its own material and starts leaning on clichés about redemption and forgiveness.
The Whale’s Sound
The film’s sound design is notable. The sound of Charlie’s breathing, the hum of his television, and the distant traffic outside all contribute to a sense of isolation that is palpable. The music is sparse, and when it swells, it does so at key moments, underscoring the emotional weight of a scene without overwhelming it. The technical craft is strong, even when the story beneath it falters.
The film’s visual style is similarly restrained. The color palette is muted, favoring browns, grays, and blues, which creates a sense of heaviness that matches the subject matter. The cinematography is competent, though it does not push beyond the serviceable. The film is not a visual tour de force, but it does not need to be.
The Whale’s Message
The film’s message is clear: love is not enough. Arnie loves Charlie, Peppy loves Charlie, and Charlie loves himself in his own way. Love alone cannot heal a broken spirit, and the film acknowledges this without ever fully resolving it. The ending is open, ambiguous, and emotionally unresolved, which is the right choice for a story about loss, but it leaves the viewer wanting more closure than the film provides.
The film’s weakness is its refusal to complicate its central idea. Charlie’s decision to accept his fate is presented as noble, but the film never fully explores whether that acceptance is a choice or a resignation. It is a subtle distinction, but it matters. The film treats Charlie’s death as inevitable, and it never questions whether that inevitability is a given or a conclusion reached too soon.
The Whale’s Final Word
The Whale is a film that means well. It wants to say something important about love, loss, and the difficulty of accepting death. It has a strong lead performance, a compelling relationship at its center, and a willingness to sit in uncomfortable silences. But it is also a film that is too literal, too heavy-handed, and too willing to settle for tragedy over insight.
Here is how the film’s strengths and weaknesses rank:
- Performances — strongest element, led by Plummer’s physical and emotional commitment.
- Tone — uneven but often effective when the film trusts itself.
- Sound design — notable, contributing to the film’s sense of isolation.
- Visual style — competent but restrained.
- Supporting cast — solid but mostly providing context.
- Script — built around a single idea hammered until the seams show.
- Direction — too heavy-handed, settling for tragedy over insight.
The film is worth seeing for Plummer’s performance alone, but it is a film that will leave you thinking about Charlie long after the credits roll, wondering whether his story needed to be told quite this way.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
