All year long, Microsoft has been telling communities that its new data centers make good neighbors. The company says it will pay local property taxes that support hospitals, schools, Parks, and Libraries. It also sends liaisons into communities to find out what those places need.
Church groups are now seeking a larger piece of the arrangement. Specifically, they want 1% of the data center costs to stay in their towns instead of getting sent back to Microsoft’s headquarters. The request comes as critics argue that Microsoft’s local investments look small next to the state-level tax breaks data center developers get in 38 states.
Some tax breaks can stretch across more than ten years. One audit from Georgia showed the state let go of $474 million in sales taxes within a single year while taking in only $41 million from the industry. Ronan Farrow, the journalist, pointed out that the state itself estimated 70 percent of data center building would still have taken place without the incentive.
Indiana allows major companies to avoid the state’s 7 percent sales tax on data center equipment. That break could cover as much as $13.2 billion in expected purchases. If the exemption had not been granted, up to $900 million might have been collected for state programs instead. The relief lasts for up to 50 years.
The Good Neighbor Promise
Microsoft is currently carrying out a public relations effort centered on the notion of being a good neighbor. The firm pledges to cover local property taxes that help fund hospitals, schools, Parks, and Libraries. Representatives are also dispatched into communities to find out what residents need.
Microsoft has appeared committed to the campaign’s goals, but critics argue its actual investments fall short when weighed against the tax breaks developers receive in other locations. The company’s local spending looks modest next to what state governments offer developers directly.
Microsoft acknowledges in public-facing documents that simply matching its employees’ charitable donations—which totaled $229 million across 29,000 nonprofits in 2024—isn’t enough. The company has been vague about what more substantial local investments might look like. At community meetings, Microsoft representatives have seemed unprepared to answer questions beyond “good neighbor” campaign materials.
The Tax Break Figures
In 38 states, data center developers get state-level tax breaks. These exemptions can stretch across more than a decade. The Georgia audit demonstrates just how much states give up through these arrangements.
Georgia lost $474 million in sales taxes over a single year while receiving back just $41 million from the industry. Ronan Farrow pointed out that the state’s own projection was that 70 percent of data center construction would have taken place regardless.
Indiana’s tax provisions are equally notable. Large corporations can acquire data center hardware without remitting the state’s 7 percent sales tax. The exemption potentially covers as much as $13.2 billion in anticipated equipment acquisitions.
The Indiana exemption is good for 50 years. Without it, up to $900 million would have been added to the tax base behind state programs.
“by the state’s own estimate, 70 percent of the data center construction would have happened anyway”
What Church Groups Want
Church groups are asking for 1% of the data center costs to stay in their towns. They want the money to support local infrastructure and services.
The contrast between the two parties’ approaches is striking. While Microsoft is still promoting itself as a good neighbor to communities, church groups are making this request at a time when the company is actively telling people it cares about them. Instead of accepting that claim, church groups are asking for proof of Microsoft’s commitment.
The Local vs. State Debate
Local communities receive a promise of property tax payments and a liaison who listens to their needs when Microsoft invests. Critics argue that these commitments pale in comparison to the estimated hundreds of millions in state-level tax breaks for data center developers in 38 states. The company’s local spending looks modest next to what state governments offer developers directly.
Georgia’s audit serves as a cautionary tale. The state forgave $474 million in sales taxes and received back only $41 million. Its own projection was that 70 percent of the construction would have proceeded regardless.
Indiana’s losses mirror the pattern. The state hands over sales tax revenue on roughly $13.2 billion in expected equipment buys. Up to $900 million could have ended up inside the tax base.
The Numbers at a Glance
| State | Tax Break | Amount at Risk |
|---|---|---|
| Georgia | Sales tax exemption | $474 million lost, $41 million returned |
| Indiana | Equipment tax exemption | $13.2 billion in purchases, up to $900 million in potential revenue |
The Cost of the Exemption
Residents of Indiana are wondering how much their communities are giving up to attract data centers, since the state’s exemption lasts for 50 years.
Georgia’s own numbers show what the deal costs. The state gave up $474 million in sales taxes in one year, while the industry returned just $41 million. Ronan Farrow pointed out that the state’s own estimate found 70 percent of data center construction would have happened anyway.
Big firms buying data center equipment in Indiana don’t pay the state’s 7 percent sales tax on it. The exemption could cover as much as $13.2 billion in projected purchases of that kind of equipment.
If the exemption had not been granted, up to $900 million could have ended up in the tax base backing state programs.
What Comes Next
Church groups are refusing to step back from their demands. Instead, they want a stake in the financial arrangements, and they want clear answers about how those arrangements are working.
The company faces a decision: it can disregard the request and keep up its campaign of being a good neighbor, or it can heed the people it is building communities with and commit to a genuine investment.
When states give up too much, the Georgia audit and the Indiana exemption demonstrate the consequences. People living in those places deserve a stronger approach.
Where the paper stands
The paper backs Microsoft’s plan to let local property taxes fund hospitals, schools, Parks, and Libraries, and is against the proposal that would carve out a separate share for church groups alone. The company’s promise to pay local taxes supports public services directly, and the paper believes that money should stay in the hands of voters who choose how it gets spent.
Church groups are asking for a share of the data center costs to stay in their towns. The paper sees this as a demand for a carve-out that separates church interests from the rest of the community, and it opposes that carve-out. The paper wants the public to have a direct say over how local tax dollars are spent, not a special interest group picking its own share.
The paper would prefer that Microsoft’s local tax payments stay attached to the hospitals, schools, Parks, and Libraries they were promised for, rather than letting a separate share be set aside for church groups alone. The reader should watch for any effort to split the tax revenue before it reaches the public purse.
Source material: “Microsoft goes quiet after church groups ask for 1% of data center costs,” Ars Technica.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.