Greenland and Denmark have made it clear that a military arrangement with the United States will not loosen their grip on the Arctic island, despite Donald Trump’s insistence that he has complete power to act as he chooses there.
The statement came after Trump announced on social media that the United States would gain “complete ability to do what is necessary in Greenland” under the deal. The arrangement would also give the US “permanent control over security, and all other needs, in Greenland,” according to his post. Denmark and Greenland released their own statement on Saturday, saying the deal respects the kingdom’s sovereignty and the Greenlandic people’s right to self-determination.
Trump’s Claims About the Deal
Trump presented the arrangement as granting the US complete independence to act in Greenland. His social media post stated that the United States would “FOREVER have the complete ability to do what is necessary in Greenland in order to secure and defend the security of Greenland, and the United States of America.”. He also said the agreement would give the US “permanent control over security, and all other needs, in Greenland.”.
Next week’s UN general assembly is expected to see the signing of the deal. No specifics have been released about the size of the US military presence in the self-governing Danish territory, nor has it been confirmed whether any formal authority over foreign policy and resources would shift to Washington.
Denmark’s Response
The Danish foreign minister, Lars Lokke Rasmussen, took a more moderate approach. He said “Next week could be a good week – for Greenland, Denmark and the United States.”, and he went on to say that a period of doubt would hopefully be replaced by a binding agreement that bolsters security in the Arctic and the north Atlantic, thus securing our common safety within Nato Europe – all while preserving the Danish kingdom’s red lines.
Jens-Frederik Nielsen, the prime minister of Greenland, expressed his approval of the proposed arrangement. He repeated the official position, pointing out that the accord upholds the sovereignty and territorial integrity of their kingdom while also protecting the Greenlandic people’s right to self-determination.
The Island’s History With the US
Since the Cold War, the United States has kept military forces stationed on Greenland. During the 1950s, the island was home to a major US military presence, prompted by fears of a nuclear exchange between the US and Soviet Union that could have led to annihilation. At that time, long-range nuclear bombers and early-warning systems were based there. Today, the US keeps a smaller military presence at the Pituffik space base, formerly known as Thule, where it monitors for missiles.
Since the beginning of the second Trump administration, the security and mineral resources of the large northern island have drawn Washington’s foreign policy attention. Officials pointed to national security, access to valuable natural resources, including rare earth minerals, and control over emerging Arctic shipping lanes as their reasons.
A renewed interest from the United States has been drawn to the island because of its strategic position. That location makes it a potential staging ground for operations in the north Atlantic and Arctic regions.
What the Deal Covers
Late Friday, representatives from the US, Denmark and Greenland announced an arrangement permitting the US to establish a substantial military presence on Greenland, with provisions that bar US adversaries from constructing their own bases there. The accord aims to stop other nations from putting down lasting military structures on the territory.
A core part of the agreement bars the use of adversary bases.
The Nato Angle
A bid by the US for more control over the Arctic island has put Nato relations under strain. In January, military personnel from eight European member nations were sent to Greenland to show military preparedness. A joint statement from those same eight allies confirmed their dedication to Arctic security.
Saturday saw a Nato spokesperson say the alliance approved the arrangement, which would “help advance security, stability and cooperation in this vital region.”.
The Sovereignty Question
The arrangement raises doubts about Greenland’s standing as a self-governing part of the Danish realm. It has been linked to the kingdom for 1,000 years.
The deal could mark a shift in that relationship. If Copenhagen cedes formal power to Washington over Greenland, which it has held for 1,000 years, it would raise questions for Greenlanders about whether “this is the beginning of replacing the colonial relationship with Denmark with a colonial relationship to the United States,” according to Mikkel Vedby Rasmussen, a political science professor at the University of Copenhagen.
The professor’s warning gets at the very tension that defines the arrangement. From Greenland’s point of view, the deal is about securing its security and economic future. From Denmark’s point of view, it is about protecting its sovereignty and its relationship with a territory it has governed for a millennium.
The Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| Late Friday | US, Denmark and Greenland announced a deal allowing US military development on Greenland |
| Saturday | Denmark and Greenland released a statement clarifying the agreement |
| Saturday | Nato spokesperson welcomed the deal |
| Next week | Expected signing at UN general assembly |
The source lays out the deal’s progress from an initial announcement through a later clarification and on to international endorsement, and it happens quickly, though without offering any reason for the pace.
What We Still Don’t Know
No specifics about the arrangement have been made public. How large a role the US military plays within the self-governing Danish territory remains unknown. So too does the matter of whether Washington would gain any formal authority over foreign policy and resources.
There is room for interpretation because the matter remains secret. Trump’s framing of the deal as giving him “complete ability to do what is necessary” sits uneasily with Denmark’ insists that the arrangement respects his red lines. Publicly, the two accounts have not yet been reconciled.
The Paper’s View
This setup looks built with Greenland’s interests in mind as the Arctic changes. Keeping adversaries off the island through a ban on their bases stands out as a central part of the agreement.
Transparency is essential when signing and putting the agreement into effect. People in Greenland should be able to see the specifics of the military presence and the advantages it brings, so they can decide for themselves if the arrangement works in their favor.
The deal is expected to be signed next week.
Where the paper stands
The paper backs neither side on this deal, but it stands ready to watch for any rule that would let a giant gather power over others, whatever its shape. Greenland is a small place with a big neighbor, and deals like this one often carry a cost the small place pays while the big one collects the benefit.
The paper’s concern here is not the deal itself but how it is handled: whether the details are shown to everyone involved, so they can judge for themselves, and whether anyone is allowed to hide the terms behind closed doors. Deals made in secret tend to work better for the party hiding the terms than for the party keeping them.
The paper wants the people of Greenland to see the full size of the US military presence, the value of any minerals involved, and the real weight of the arrangement’s provisions, before anyone signs anything. The paper believes that transparency is the only way to keep power from gathering in one place, and that is the test of this deal.
Source material: “Denmark and Greenland say US military agreement will not compromise Arctic territory’s sovereignty,” The Guardian.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.