Anti-Muslim rhetoric has become a regular part of Republican campaign messaging, and a new montage shows how far it has traveled. The ads feature narrators warning of “Radical Islam” in Texas, Oklahoma, and across the West, with one saying “They don’t think we deserve the right to exist as Americans or as Christians.” Another warns of Sharia law spreading through the country.
Muslims make up about 1% of the U.S. population. The montage includes several voices warning of Sharia law, hate for the American way of life, and Oklahoma coming next. There has been virtually no condemnation from Republicans over this language.
The Project That Started It
The current wave traces back about two years to a Muslim community-development project in Texas that drew attention, investigations, and lawsuits from Texas Republicans. That project became a focus on Sharia law, acting as a nexus for the spread of anti-Muslim rhetoric.
The Sharia-Free America Caucus on Capitol Hill now has dozens of GOP members. Sharia refers to Islamic rules for the way practicing Muslims live their life. The ads distort it as something that can be superimposed on the American legal system.
Who Won After the Fear Began
The fear-mongering about Sharia echoes the great replacement conspiracy theory. That theory is linked to deadly attacks including San Diego, Buffalo, Pittsburgh, and El Paso.
The fear began to rise after the elections of Mayor Zohran Mamdani in New York and Abdul El-Sayed, who won the Democratic primary for Senate in Michigan. The timing suggests a familiar pattern: successful Muslim politicians followed by a backlash.
What the Consultant Said
Republican consultant Vinny Minchillo, who worked for President Trump, said fear is a motivating issue for voters. He noted polls show economy and inflation are people’s top concern.
Minchillo said Republicans are excited to have a problem to talk about that isn’t economy and inflation. The Texas project was the origin of the new chapter of anti-Muslim hate.
The Backlash Pattern
There is a familiar shape to this cycle. Successful Muslim politicians trigger a backlash, and that backlash becomes a national talking point. Some see the strategy as weakening inroads Republicans have made in more conservative pockets of Muslim communities. Many American voters who aren’t Muslim are also disturbed and offended by the hate speech.
The Danger in the Words
Experts say the language can lead to real harm and threats. The montage is a snapshot of a campaign strategy that treats Muslims as a political problem rather than a demographic.
The ads are not subtle. They warn of a foreign law system taking hold and of Muslims who believe Americans do not deserve to exist. The message is simple: fear the other, and vote against them.
| Stage | Event |
|---|---|
| Texas Project | Muslim community-development project draws attention, investigations, lawsuits |
| Deadly Attacks | San Diego, Buffalo, Pittsburgh, El Paso linked to great replacement theory |
| National Spread | Sharia-Free America Caucus formed on Capitol Hill |
| Election Wins | Mamdani elected Mayor of New York, El-Sayed wins Michigan Senate primary |
| Current Wave | GOP candidates use anti-Muslim ads nationwide |
Our View
Republicans are using fear of Muslims to divert attention from economic problems. That is a cynical move, and it plays into a pattern where successful Muslim politicians trigger backlash.
The paper’s principles of live and let live and a light touch on technology conflict with this campaign strategy. The fear-mongering is not harmless political theater; it is language that has been linked to deadly attacks.
The GOP has a problem to solve, and it is not Sharia law. It is the economy.
Where the paper stands
The paper backs no side in this fight and says plainly: the right test of a candidate is not which machine they serve but whether they stand for individual freedom, small business, and no concentrations of power, and these ads fail that test. Anti-Muslim rhetoric, deployed across Texas, Oklahoma, and the West, is not a legitimate political issue. It is a distortion of Sharia law, a wedge issue, and a strategy that plays into a pattern of backlash against successful Muslim politicians.
The ads warn of Sharia law spreading across the country and of Muslims who allegedly do not think Americans deserve to exist as Americans or Christians. That is not an argument. It is a smear. The paper’s north star of individual freedom, small business, and no concentrations of power is violated when politics becomes a war of words aimed at a single group.
The paper wants candidates to run on the economy, inflation, and issues that matter to voters, not on fear of a religious minority. The montage shows a campaign strategy that treats Muslims as a problem to be solved, not as fellow citizens. The reader should watch for any candidate who uses similar language — warning of a foreign law system taking hold or suggesting Muslims do not belong — and judge them against the paper’s fixed standards, not against which party they happen to belong to.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.