An immigration expert is warning that mass migration is eating away at the ability of Western nations to govern themselves. Lora Ries, director of the Border Security and Immigration Center at The Heritage Foundation, says the trend has moved beyond the United States and is now reshaping Europe.
Ries points to the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and other Western European countries as examples where mass migration is weakening national sovereignty. Her argument is that groups pushing for more migrants treat mobility as a normal part of economics and population growth, while some migrants fail to settle in, form ethnic neighborhoods, and shift languages — all without officials stepping in because of political correctness.
She asks whether the U.K. and France are still the same countries. The U.S., she says, is on the same path but further behind.
Ries’s Case Against Mass Migration
Ries’s central claim is that mass migration is changing the character of Western nations without anyone stopping it. She cites the lack of assimilation among some migrants, the formation of ethnic enclaves, and language shifts as evidence of this change. She also notes that law enforcement and elected officials hesitate to address the matter due to political correctness.
The pattern, she says, appeared in a handful of countries at the same time during Biden’s four years, including the U.S. Similar tactics involved groups pushing for more migrants while treating mobility as a normal economic and demographic reality.
Her solution is to return to the original reasons for giving people refuge, which must be a government actor persecuting someone on account of their race, religion, nationality, or political opinion. She argues that the current approach is unsustainable for the nations being overrun.
Trump’s Speech at the U.N.
President Donald Trump took a similar line last week at the U.N. General Assembly. He criticized the U.N.’s UNESCO group for promoting mass migration while protecting cultural heritage.
“There is no human right to illegal immigration, but there is a right to remain a sovereign nation,” Trump said.
He also said it was deeply ironic that the U.N. has an entire institution, the UNESCO group of people and countries, devoted to protecting cultural heritage — yet with its constant promotion of mass migration, these globalists are actively destroying the greatest cultures and most extraordinary heritage in history.
The U.N. Agenda Behind the Push
Ries points to the U.N. 2030 agenda as the engine driving this push. That agenda is a universal action plan adopted in 2015 by its member states to fight poverty and climate change. At its heart are 17 sustainable development goals.
Critics believe the U.N. sees mass migration as a way to hit all 17 of those goals, though Ries argues it is not sustainable for the nation-states being overrun. The IOM, an arm of the U.N., is committed to the idea that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society.
The Caravan Crossing and the Response
DHS responded to a migrant caravan crossing into Mexico by saying the days of “catch and release” are over and Biden’s open border policy has been SEALED SHUT. The statement urged migrants to be aware that the dangerous trip to the U.S. is no longer an option.
| Group | Position on Mass Migration |
|---|---|
| Ries | Warns it erodes sovereignty; wants tighter legal grounds for refuge |
| Trump | Criticizes UNESCO for promoting migration while protecting heritage |
| U.N. | Sees migration as a path to 17 sustainable development goals |
| IOM | Committed to humane and orderly migration |
What Is at Stake
Ries’s concern is that Western countries are losing control of their own identity. Her question about whether the U.K. and France are still the same countries gets at the core of her argument: that mass migration is changing the composition of these nations without anyone stopping it.
The comparison to the U.S. is Ries’s own framing. She says the U.S. is on the same path but further behind. That suggests the erosion of sovereignty is a process, not an accident.
The Globalist vs. Sovereign Debate
Trump’s speech at the U.N. General Assembly framed the conflict as a clash between globalist institutions and national governments. He called the promotion of mass migration “deeply ironic” given UNESCO’s stated mission to protect cultural heritage.
Ries’s warning about sovereignty fits this framing. She sees the U.N. 2030 agenda as a mechanism that pushes migration as a solution to poverty and climate change, even as it weakens the very nation-states trying to meet those goals.
The tension is that the globalist institutions promoting migration see it as a universal good, while the national leaders like Trump see it as a threat to their country’s identity and control.
Key Facts
- Lora Ries: Director of the Border Security and Immigration Center at The Heritage Foundation
- U.N. 2030 agenda: Adopted in 2015 by U.N. member states; 17 sustainable development goals
- Biden’s four years: The period during which similar tactics appeared in a handful of countries, including the U.S.
- UNESCO: The U.N. group Trump criticized for promoting mass migration while protecting cultural heritage
- DHS statement: “The days of ‘catch and release’ are over”; Biden’s open border policy SEALED SHUT
The Warning on the Table
The warning about sovereignty is not new, but it has gained urgency as migration pressures mount. The question is whether Western nations can hold their ground without closing entirely.
Ries’s warning is that the U.S. could become like the U.K. or France, only later. Whether that happens depends on how seriously the nation takes the problem.
The warning is on the table.
Source material: “Mass migration eroding Western sovereignty, immigration expert warns,” Fox News.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.