The Conservatives have promised to scrap the “absurd cliff edge” where parents in England lose childcare support once household income crosses £100,000. Under current rules, both parents must earn below that threshold to qualify for government-funded or tax-free childcare.
The move is described as a “first step” in broader efforts to address issues in the tax system which damage incentives to work or invest. Shadow chancellor Andrew Griffith will cover it in his conference speech on Monday.
How the £100,000 Threshold Works
Under current rules, free childcare — 30 hours for children aged nine months to four years — and the government’s tax-free childcare scheme are available only if neither parent earns above £100,000. For every £8 paid into an online childcare account, the government adds £2, up to £2,000 per child per year.
Economists have criticised the threshold, saying it can leave parents worse off after a pay rise of tens of thousands of pounds. The threshold applies to both schemes, and families hit it even if only one parent crosses the line. That means a family where one parent earns £100,001 and the other stays below the threshold still loses the support, despite the second parent earning well within the limit.
Badenoch’s Case Against the Threshold
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch defended the move, arguing that the threshold punishes people who work hard. She said the party does not want “people to stop working because of that.”
“What we want to see is more people in work and not taking the wrong decisions or the wrong choices,” she added, “and it doesn’t matter whether they’re earning £10,000 or £100,000 – what matters is that people are out there working.”
When asked if a £1 million earner could get free childcare, Badenoch replied: “It doesn’t matter what you earn – we don’t want you to be punished for working hard. What we’re trying to do is grow our economy.”
The Cost of Removing It
The policy would remove the £100,000 threshold entirely. The Tories say the threshold may cause people to delay having children or avoid starting a family.
They argue scrapping it is “both pro-family and pro-growth.” Funding comes from cutting public servants in executive non-departmental public bodies like Arts Council England and the Environment Agency.
This is projected to save £1.6bn by 2029-30, covering the estimated £700m cost of removal. The savings come from cutting staff at those public bodies, not from raising taxes or cutting other services.
Griffith’s Broader Frame
Griffith framed the move as part of a wider push for lower, simpler, and fairer taxes across the board. His conference speech on Monday will cover the policy in full.
The Tories argue that removing the threshold will encourage more people to work and start families without worrying about losing support. The party says the change is about fairness, not just childcare.
The Political Context
The Conservatives trail Labour and Reform UK in polls. The party says it is new and different from the one that lost the 2024 general election.
Badenoch made the point directly, positioning the party as distinct from its predecessor. The childcare promise is part of that effort to reset the brand.
What Gets Cut to Pay for It
The funding plan targets public servants in executive non-departmental public bodies, including Arts Council England and the Environment Agency. The cuts are meant to pay for the estimated £700m cost of removing the threshold.
The projected £1.6bn savings by 2029-30 cover that cost.
Key Numbers
- £100,000: the income threshold for free childcare and tax-free childcare
- £2,000: maximum annual government contribution per child
- £1.6bn: projected savings by 2029-30 from cutting public servants
- £700m: estimated cost of removing the threshold
- 30 hours: free childcare for children aged nine months to four years
The party is promising a benefit to working families while cutting funding for cultural and environmental institutions. Whether that combination lands as a bargain or a contradiction remains to be seen.
The Conservatives are betting that the childcare pitch lands better than the cuts do. That is a bet worth watching.
Where the paper stands
The paper backs parents getting a fairer deal on childcare support and is against money vanishing into a budget nobody voted on line by line, and supports any plan that would give taxpayers real control over where it goes. The childcare threshold punishes families for one parent’s earnings, and the paper is against that kind of punishment. But the funding plan raises questions about control, since the cuts target public servants in Arts Council England and the Environment Agency, institutions that serve their own purposes. The paper wants citizens to have a far more direct say in where that money goes than today’s system gives them.
The paper supports the aim of removing the threshold, but it wants the funding to come from a process that gives taxpayers real control over where it goes, not from cuts to public servants that nobody voted on line by line. Readers should watch whether the party’s promise of a fairer deal for working families holds up against the cuts to arts and environment funding that pay for it.
Source material: “Tories pledge to scrap £100,000 childcare 'cliff edge',” the BBC.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.