Three London crypto trading locations have received cease-and-desist letters from Britain’s financial regulator, marking what looks like the end of light-touch regulation in the UK.
Tax authorities HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), the Metropolitan Police from London, and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) together instructed traders at three locations to cease running illegal peer-to-peer cryptocurrency operations. The FCA noted that no such peer-to-peer cryptocurrency enterprises are registered in Britain, which means operators outside its regime avoid the protections meant to spot and stop money laundering.
The Cease-and-Desist Letters
The FCA issued cease-and-desist letters at the three locations, demanding traders stop taking part in illegal crypto businesses. When people buy and sell crypto directly with each other, it is called peer-to-peer trading, and that kind of activity must be legally registered in the UK.
What the Action Means
This move signals a change from issuing warnings to taking action. The FCA has previously warned about unregistered crypto businesses, but this is the second coordinated enforcement operation in six months.
Why the Raids Matter
A lawyer at Gherson Solicitors LLP has signalled the end of the “light-touch” era of crypto regulation in the UK. Caroline Black, who works there as a consultant, made the remark after noting the second coordinated enforcement operation in six months. The operation confirms the FCA’s shift from warnings to active disruption of unregistered P2P crypto businesses, she said.
Any operator trading by way of business without the proper registration faces a live risk of criminal liability, according to Black.
“By operating outside the FCA’s registration regime, they avoid controls designed to detect and prevent money laundering.”
What the FCA’s Guidance Covers
Under the new framework, the FCA has published guidance on which activities need to be registered, including issuing qualifying stablecoins, running crypto exchanges, handling deals and coordinating them, safeguarding digital assets and staking.
The guidance also set out the activities that need FCA approval.
The 2027 Timeline
The full framework for Britain’s cryptocurrency regime comes into force on Oct. 25, 2027. Companies will be able to seek FCA approval from Sept. 30, with the application window closing in Feb. 28, 2027.
Capco managing principal Aditya Mittal advised that companies should first determine which parts of their operations fall under the FCA’s guidance before taking any action.
The Shift From Warning to Disruption
The Financial Conduct Authority has stopped issuing correspondence and has instead moved to winding up its operations entirely. The contrast between the two approaches is striking.
Operators should take the raids as a sign that unregistered activity will no longer be allowed. The FCA has issued guidance spelling out what requires approval, with the application window starting on Sept. 30.
The Timeline
| Event | Date |
|---|---|
| Cease-and-desist letters issued | Now |
| FCA approval window opens | Sept. 30 |
| Approval window closes | Feb. 28, 2027 |
| Framework takes effect | Oct. 25, 2027 |
The era of gentle guidance is over. The FCA has shifted from issuing warnings to taking action, and the UK’s crypto firms must now decide between compliance and the end of their operations.
Where the paper stands
The paper backs the traders against the FCA and is against the FCA’s decision to treat peer-to-peer cryptocurrency operations as illegal, especially when those operations exist outside the regime that was meant to catch them. The FCA has moved from issuing warnings to taking action, and the paper sees that shift as a step toward treating crypto as a problem to be stamped out rather than an industry with its own legitimate place.
The FCA’s logic is clear: because no peer-to-peer crypto enterprise is registered in Britain, operators outside its regime avoid the protections meant to spot and stop money laundering. That logic leaves no room for the small trader who simply wants to buy and sell with another person. The paper has long argued that regulation tends to protect the biggest players and raise the cost of entry for small ones, and this case fits that pattern — the FCA’s reach widens while the space for ordinary, unregistered trading shrinks.
The paper would prefer a narrower approach, one aimed only at the harm of money laundering rather than a broad ban on unregistered trading. Operators should prepare for the coming framework, as Capco’s Aditya Mittal advises, but the paper hopes the final rulebook does not punish every trader who never touched a penny of dirty money. The reader should watch for whether the FCA’s actual practice matches its stated goals — a regulator that disrupts first and asks questions later is one thing, and a regulator that enforces narrowly against real harm is another.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.