Łukasz Róg’s “Rage of Stars” runs 106 minutes and carries three genre labels: action, science fiction, thriller. That is a lot of freight for one film to move, and the movie never quite decides which of the three is driving.
What it does commit to is a premise. A woman from the International Special Forces Unit has a premonition about the impending end of humanity. That is the whole engine. Everything in “Rage of Stars” turns on whether you accept that a soldier with a warning nobody asked for is enough to hold a feature together.
Trailer, via Lukasz Rog.
Jemma and the Unit
Andrea Tivadar plays Jemma, the soldier at the center of it. The film gives her the premonition and then asks her to operate inside a chain of command that has no reason to believe her. That tension is the most interesting thing Róg and co-writer Krzysztof Klader put on the page.
Around her, the unit is a small, clearly named group. Jord Knotter plays Luk. Jack McEvoy plays Kriss. Elijah Rowen plays Tom. Małgorzata Klara plays the Commander, the figure who presumably decides what to do with Jemma’s warning. None of these roles get the space a 106-minute runtime could afford them, and the film feels the loss.
The Cast, Top to Bottom
The billing is long for a movie this size, and it tells you something about how the story is built — a core team, then a run of small parts that sketch the world outside it.
- Andrea Tivadar as Jemma
- Jord Knotter as Luk
- Jack McEvoy as Kriss
- Elijah Rowen as Tom
- Małgorzata Klara as Commander
- Mayu Gralińska Sakai as Maya
- Jakub Ormaniec as Mike
Below that line sit Milena Grzybek as the Waitress, Monika Gieron as the Dancer, Natalia Filak as the Receptionist, Noah Culbreth as the Son, and Aleksandra Bąk as the Reporter. Those are the film’s civilian faces, and their presence is the clearest sign that “Rage of Stars” wants to show what the end of humanity would actually cost.
Three Genres, One Runtime
Here is where the film’s ambition and its execution pull apart. The three labels promise three different movies, and the source material gives us no evidence that Róg reconciles them.
| Element | What “Rage of Stars” promises | What 106 minutes allows |
|---|---|---|
| Action | A Special Forces unit in the field | Room for set pieces, not for the people in them |
| Science fiction | A premonition about humanity’s end | A concept that needs rules the film must state |
| Thriller | A warning no one will believe | Sustained dread, which needs patience |
That table is not a knock on the premise. It is a description of the problem. A premonition is a science-fiction device. A unit that won’t listen is a thriller device. A soldier who acts anyway is an action device. “Rage of Stars” wants all three running at once, and at 106 minutes it cannot give each one the time it needs to land.
The Premonition Problem
A premonition is only as good as the film’s willingness to define it. Does Jemma see the end of humanity, or feel it, or know it? The source material does not tell us, and that vagueness is baked into the concept rather than solved by it.
What the film does have is a clean dramatic question: what does a soldier do when her warning is real and her orders are not? That question does not need a big budget. It needs a script willing to sit in the discomfort of a chain of command that has already decided Jemma is wrong. “Rage of Stars” gestures at that discomfort. It rarely sits in it.
What Tivadar Is Given
Tivadar carries the film, and the role asks her to move between two modes — the professional soldier and the woman who knows something terrible is coming. The film’s best moments should live in the gap between those two, and the casting suggests Róg understood that.
The supporting cast is doing recognizable work. Knotter’s Luk and McEvoy’s Kriss read as unit colleagues, the kind of roles that exist to give the lead someone to talk to and something to lose. Rowen’s Tom and Klara’s Commander fill out the command structure. Gralińska Sakai’s Maya and Ormaniec’s Mike round out the team.
None of this is wasted. None of it is enough to make “Rage of Stars” feel like more than a premise in search of a movie.
Where the Film Stands
“Rage of Stars” arrives with a 6.0 out of 10 audience score on TMDB, drawn from 97 votes. That is a small sample, and it should be read as one — 97 votes is a thin slice of anyone’s audience, and a number that low tells you more about who showed up than about what the film is.
Still, 6.0 is a fair landing spot for what the film actually is. It is not a disaster. It is a movie with a strong central idea, a committed lead, and a runtime that cannot support the three genres it claims. The action, science fiction and thriller labels are not lies, exactly. They are a wish list.
The premonition is the part worth keeping. A woman in a Special Forces unit who knows the end is coming, and who has to convince people who outrank her — that is a film with a spine. “Rage of Stars” has the spine and not much muscle around it.
The Verdict on Rage of Stars
What matters here is not the score. It is the gap between the concept and the execution, and that gap is the whole story of “Rage of Stars.” Róg and Klader built a movie around a single strong image — a soldier with a warning — and then handed it three genres it could not feed.
The supporting cast is fine. Tivadar is fine. The premise is better than fine. What the film lacks is the discipline to pick one lane and stay in it for 106 minutes.
That is a fixable problem, and it is the reason “Rage of Stars” is worth a look rather than a dismissal. A filmmaker who can conceive Jemma can, on a second try, give her a film that trusts her premonition enough to slow down and let it breathe.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
