WRITTEN IN PLAIN AMERICAN ENGLISH.
About
CLAY TRIBUNE.
Advertisement

Maze Runner Review: Walls Close, Answers Never Arrive

The Maze Runner review: a tense YA maze thriller with strong visuals but shallow characters and a rushed ending. Worth a watch for fans, not skeptics.

By mitch·3 min read
A young man in a jacket stands in a grassy stone courtyard, gazing at massive walls opening into a dark maze.

The Maze Runner arrives with a premise that promises escape, but spends most of its 113 minutes building walls. Based on James Dashner’s young-adult novel, the film drops a boy named Thomas into a vast stone enclosure called the Glade, ringed by towering walls that open each morning and close each night. Beyond those walls is a shifting labyrinth full of deadly mechanical creatures. No one remembers how they got there. No one knows why.

That setup is the film’s strongest asset. The Glade is a functioning society of teenage boys who have organized themselves into runners, farmers, and builders. They have rules, a leader in the stern but fair Alby, and a fragile peace. Then Thomas arrives, and the peace starts to crack. He is curious, reckless, and strangely familiar with the maze. The runners, led by the capable Minho, have mapped sections of it for years without finding an exit. Thomas believes he can change that.

Trailer, via 20th Century Studios.

Advertisement

The Maze and Its Runners

The film’s action is at its best when it is inside the maze. The walls shift at night, and the Grievers — half-machine, half-creature monsters with metal spikes — hunt anyone caught after dark. The chase sequences have real tension, and the production design of the Glade is convincingly lived-in. Director Wes Ball keeps the pacing brisk, and the young cast is serviceable, with Dylan O’Brien as Thomas carrying the film with a mix of confusion and determination.

But the script leans heavily on mystery without delivering much depth. The boys speak in exposition, constantly reminding each other of rules and fears they would already know. The dialogue is functional but rarely sharp. The supporting characters, including the comic-relief Chuck and the skeptical Gally, are sketched in broad strokes. You understand their roles before you understand their motives.

  • The maze changes every night, making maps unreliable.
  • The Grievers only appear after dark.
  • Thomas is the first newcomer in a month.
  • The boys have been trapped for three years.

The Glade’s Limits

The film’s central problem is that it asks the audience to care about a mystery it refuses to advance. For long stretches, the characters run, argue, and plan, but the plot moves in circles. The Glade is a closed system, and the script seems trapped inside it with the boys. When answers finally arrive, they come in a rush of last-minute reveals that feel rushed and undercooked. The ending sets up a sequel with a heavy hand, trading resolution for a promise of more.

The performances are earnest across the board. O’Brien does solid work as a protagonist who is both confused and driven. Will Poulter, as the antagonistic Gally, brings a believable edge of fear and resentment. But the material rarely gives them room to do more than react to the next reveal. The film is competent, often visually striking, and never dull. It is also shallow, leaning on its premise rather than building characters or ideas worth investing in.

The Maze Runner is a decent piece of young-adult entertainment, but it is not a great film. It has momentum, a strong central concept, and a few genuinely tense sequences. What it lacks is the substance to make the mystery matter. The maze is more interesting than the people running through it, and that imbalance keeps the film from rising above its genre trappings.

The published critical score for The Maze Runner is 5.7 out of 10.

  • Runtime: 113 minutes
  • Director: Wes Ball
  • Based on the novel by James Dashner
  • Critical score: 5.7 of 10

The Maze Runner is worth a watch for fans of the book or the genre, but it will not convert skeptics. It is a competent puzzle with a forgettable payoff. The walls close, the credits roll, and the biggest question left is not what happens next, but whether the sequel will bother to answer it.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *