The Cat in the Hat arrived in theaters with a simple pitch: take Dr. Seuss’s beloved children’s book, put Mike Myers in a giant red hat, and let chaos happen. What emerged was a movie that treated the source material as a punchline rather than a foundation. The result is a box-office failure, a critical disaster, and a film that has spent nearly two decades being forgotten. It deserves to stay that way.
Trailer, via Amblin Entertainment.
Myers vs. the Book
A simple setup underlies the story. Conrad and Sally Walden find themselves shut inside on a wet afternoon while their mother is away at work. Their babysitter, Mrs. Kwan, drifts off at her station. It’s then that the Cat in the Hat shows up, pledging to turn the day into something worth remembering. He hauls in Thing One and Thing Two, two babbling troublemakers sealed in a box, to help him with his plans. The children attempt to preserve the state of the house, yet the Cat’s schemes end up ruining it instead.
The Cat is played by Mike Myers as a wisecracking, sarcastic creature with a red-and-white striped top hat and a large red bow tie. He is meant to be charming. He is not. Instead, Myers gives a performance that reads less as a character and more as a series of jokes about himself. The Cat’s lines are packed with pop-culture references and self-awareness that fall flat. He fails to be scary. He fails to be funny. He is merely annoying.
“Don’t mess with the hat.”
The tagline captures the issue at hand. The picture handles the Cat as a joke instead of a genuine danger. The children ought to fear him. Instead, they find him confusing. The motion picture never backs its own setup. It cannot decide if the Cat is a magical being from some other realm or merely a person in a costume. It simply accepts that the Cat is Mike Myers and moves forward with that assumption.
Baldwin’s Neighbor From Hell
Larry Quinn, played by Alec Baldwin, is the Waldens’ neighbor. He is described as arrogant, lazy, unscrupulous, and unemployed. He takes food from the Waldens, pretends to be a successful salesman, and seeks to marry Joan for her money. He also plans to send Conrad to military school to get rid of him. Baldwin portrays Larry as a rude, disgusting slob in debt, allergic to cats, and desperate to climb the social ladder.
Joan’s marriage proposal is left unfinished. The thefts pass by without much attention. His cat allergy comes up again and again for laughs instead of showing who he really is. Baldwin brings real talent to the part, yet the writing fails him at every turn. He is a villain without a reason behind his actions, and there is no way Baldwin can fix that.
Preston’s Joan and the Kids
Joan Walden is played by Kelly Preston, and she is a workaholic real estate agent with Humberfloob’s Real Estate. Because she is hosting a bimonthly Meet & Greet office party at her house that night, she leaves her children behind and forbids them to enter the living room, which must stay spotless for the occasion. Sally, her 8-year-old daughter, is dull, somewhat bossy, well-behaved, and rule-abiding. Conrad, her 12-year-old son, is imaginative, destructive, and misbehaved. Dakota Fanning plays Sally and Spencer Breslin plays Conrad.
Preston handles the part with skill. She portrays Joan as a mother who loves her daughter but is worn down by her responsibilities. Fanning does well within her limited part. Breslin stands out more than either of them, giving Conrad’s exasperation real force. Yet neither of these two performers gets a chance to truly stand out. The film centers on Myers and the Cat, and every other actor is left playing a supporting role, watching from the sidelines.
The Things and the Crank
The Things are the film’s greatest error. They are depicted as gibbering troublemakers who do the opposite of whatever they are instructed to do. A crate that the Cat carries in with him serves as their prison, and it is a portal to his world. Conrad picks the crab lock on the crate, and the Things break free. Their escape sets off chaos throughout the house, and they are the cause of the trio’s departure to hunt for Nevins, the family dog.
These creatures are meant to provide comic relief, yet they fail entirely. They contribute nothing of substance. They offer no dialogue, and their actions move the story forward in no way. What remains is merely a visual joke stretched out far past its welcome. The film devotes far too much time to their antics, all without ever bothering to explain what purpose they serve beyond the simple desire for disorder.
Conrad disobeys the Cat’s warning and tampers with the crank lock anyway. The lock then catches hold of Nevins’s collar, and the dog runs off. The trio drives after Larry, who has kidnapped Nevins, in the Cat’s super-powered vehicle. Meanwhile, the Cat deceives Larry into bringing back the dog. This entire episode plays out as a pursuit that contributes no new substance to the plot.
DreamWorks’ Long Road to Production
In June 1996, DreamWorks Pictures bought the rights to the book. The production company waited until after the 2000 live-action version of How the Grinch Stole Christmas! proved a hit at the box office before starting work on their own adaptation. A number of actors were considered for the lead part before Myers took it in March 2002. The principal photography took place largely in California, running from October 2002 through January 2003. To create the film’s main setting, twenty-four houses were built.
A major studio backed this big-budget project, which attached a star early and set a release date. Its production history is worth noting because it shows the scale of its ambition. But that failure is not an accident; it is a symptom of a script that never figured out what it wanted to be.
The Cat’s role was first offered to Tim Allen, who admitted being frightened of Seuss’s “mischievous feline babysitter,” as a child. That fear became the reason behind his desire to play the part, bringing an edge to it. Allen described the Cat as a person who changes into a feline, much like a werewolf or a vampire, as he grows more irritated with the children. However, no screenplay was commissioned until late February 2001, at which point Berg, Mandel, and Jeff Schaffer were hired by the studio to revise the film. By then, Allen was already locked into shooting Walt Disney Pictures’ The Santa Clause 2, which itself had been put off due to Allen’s request for a revised script. Because of his tight schedule, he eventually stepped away from the role.
A few years before this production got underway, Eric Roth wrote an original draft for the film. Berg, Mandel, and Schaffer then came in and rewrote it. The finished movie bears little resemblance to the book on which it’s based. The Cat in the film isn’t a mischievous babysitter; he’s a wisecracker. The Things aren’t a lesson; they’re a nuisance. The chase scene isn’t the climax of the story — it’s a detour. And the whole thing plays like a live-action cartoon that never quite settles into a steady pace.
The Numbers Tell the Story
On November 8, 2003, The Cat in the Hat premiered in Universal City, California. It followed with a release in North American theaters by Universal Pictures on November 21. With a budget of $109 million, it grossed $134 million worldwide. That modest return did little to match the film’s critical fate. Critics delivered overwhelmingly negative reviews, a reputation that far outlasted its box-office failure.
A studio put all its money into a star-driven adaptation of a cherished children’s book, and it got it entirely wrong. That gamble has produced a film that fails at nearly every level: it fails to deliver a coherent vision, it fails to show respect for the original source material, and it fails to execute its premise with any sense of care or competence. The result is a cautionary tale about what happens when a studio bet everything on a star-driven adaptation of a beloved children’s book and got it completely wrong.
This film should never be watched, rented, or recommended. It leaves a stain on the legacy of Dr. Seuss, squanders talent, and stands as a reminder of how badly a movie can miss its mark.
The Cat in the Hat is a disaster.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
