“Snakes on a Plane” is a film built entirely on momentum. It knows exactly what it is from the moment Samuel L. Jackson steps onto a Boeing 747-400 to escort a witness across the Pacific, and it spends 105 minutes refusing to let that momentum stall. This is a movie about a man named Neville Flynn who will not let a crate of venomous snakes stand between him and justice, and it trusts the audience to laugh, scream, and cheer in equal measure.
The setup is plain and ridiculous, and the movie embraces both aspects. An FBI officer named Flynn takes his seat on a flight bound for Los Angeles from Honolulu to guard a man called Sean Jones, who has watched a crime lord named Eddie Kim kill a prosecutor named Daniel Hayes. Kim’s scheme involves a container packed with snakes, set inside the cargo hold so the plane will crash before it arrives at Los Angeles International Airport. The picture heightens the terror by giving one of Kim’s ‘s henchmen, disguised as an airport ground employee, spray the passengers’ leis a chemical that drives the snakes into a furious state.
Trailer, via Arrow Video.
The Setup That Works
The premise alone holds great promise for a steady stream of jokes, yet the writers John Heffernan, Sebastian Gutierrez, and David Dalessandro choose to build suspense instead of squandering it across the opening scenes. The crate gives way midway through the flight, and the snakes move through the cabin with a deliberate, unhurried menace that sells the threat far better than any gore ever could.
The film’s first killings are brief and pointed. A cat in the cargo hold, a couple having sex in a restroom, and a man using another restroom are the initial victims. These deaths are quick, almost offhand, and they establish that nobody on this aircraft is safe. The captain, Sam McKeon, investigates the power failure caused by a viper attacking an electrical panel and fixes an electrical short, but is killed by the viper in the process.
His death is the film’s first real shock, and it lands because the script has spent enough time with him to make his fate matter.
Rick, ignorant of the snakes, thinks Sam has had a heart attack and presses on toward LAX. That error drives the film’s second half. Several snakes strike Rick, and in his struggle against them, he sets off the oxygen masks across the aircraft, sending most of the snakes down into the cabin with them. Many passengers, including Agent Sanders, die as the snakes overrun the cabin. The survivors, having reached the front of the plane, erect barricades of baggage to hold back the snakes. Rick is struck by the creatures, and the descent of the plane sends a food trolley smashing through the baggage barricade. The passengers then retreat to the upstairs flight deck.
“Sit back. Relax. Enjoy the fright.”
The film’s tagline states its whole approach, and it is a command rather than a promise. Few action thrillers deliver with the same consistency, but this one does.
Samuel L. Jackson Carries the Load
This film works because Samuel L. Jackson carries it. He plays Flynn with a rough authority that never slides into camp, not even when the world around him falls apart. His performance anchors a movie that depends heavily on practical effects and constant motion. Jackson’s hold on the screen is so strong that the film can get away with spending long stretches of its runtime simply letting him react to the chaos instead of trying to fight it directly.
The film’s secondary players come from both recognizable names and lesser-known performers, and it gives them attention in differing measure. Claire Miller, played by Julianna Margulies, is one of the central survivors along with Flynn. Nathan Phillips portrays Sean Jones, whose testimony serves as the whole basis for why the plane even exists. Kenan Thompson takes on the part of Troy, while Rachel Blanchard plays Mercedes. Flex Alexander appears as Three G’s, Keith Dallas as Big Leroy, Sunny Mabrey as Tiffany, Lin Shaye as Grace, Elsa Pataky as Maria, Bruce James as Ken, and Casey Dubois as Curtis.
Each of these people has little beyond mere survival to occupy them here, yet the film manages to make their very existence matter. Claire Miller’s presence gives the mayhem a human center, and her scenes with Flynn come closest to true character growth in the whole picture. The other travelers are mostly shaped by how they react, which suits a film this quick without losing its hold on the audience.
The Fanbase Built It
The title, the casting, and the premise drew considerable attention before the film’s release, building large fanbases online. That attention turned “Snakes on a Plane” into an Internet phenomenon. In response, New Line Cinema incorporated feedback from online users into its production, adding five days of reshooting. It arrived in North America and the UK on August 18, 2006, carrying a reputation that was both earned and manufactured.
The noise around the picture was genuine, yet the numbers at the box office did not match it. The film pulled in just $15.25 million over its opening weekend, falling short of what had been expected. Its total haul stood at $62 million by the time it reached home video on January 2, 2007. That distance between cultural attention and financial performance stands out as one of the film’s most notable traits: a hit in talk, a miss on paper.
Where It Falls Short
The problems here are in how the story is put together, not in how it looks. This is a picture about a man on a plane fighting snakes, and it devotes too much time to telling you what that is rather than letting you see it happen. Once the snakes are loose and the passengers are shut in, the pace slows down because the film keeps spelling out the circumstances instead of letting them unfold naturally. Rick’s error with the oxygen masks sets up a clever situation, but the film lingers too long after that, dwelling on the snakes falling into the cabin and the passengers dying in slow-motion close-ups that come across as padding rather than fright.
The film’s tone problem comes from trying to be two things at once. It wants to be a thrilling action picture, yet it keeps leaning into the absurdity of its premise, which makes the scares less effective. A snake falling from the ceiling is funnier than frightening after an hour of hearing about the crate and the pheromone. The film never commits to being either a serious thriller or a comedy, and that indecision shows up in its pacing.
The Legacy Is Real
The movie’s reputation endures, despite its modest takings at the box office. It was mocked and referenced on TV shows, fan-produced clips, video games, and several kinds of writing. The saying “Snakes on a Plane” became part of everyday speech as a quick way to refer to an absurd notion that somehow succeeded. The picture stands as proof of a time when the Internet could create a following before anything existed, and the people behind it answered by delivering precisely what that following demanded.
It’s worth noting that this film actually engaged with its online audience rather than ignoring it. The five days of reshooting were a direct response to fan feedback, and that willingness to adapt is a rare thing in Hollywood.
The Verdict
“Snakes on a Plane” is a film that understands its own premise and executes it with precision. It is not a great film, but it is a confident one. The direction by David R. Ellis is competent and unpretentious, and the writing is sharp enough to sustain a premise that could easily have collapsed under its own weight. The cast is game, the practical effects are effective, and the pacing is relentless.
The movie earns its reputation for revealing details that escape notice on first viewing. A man struck down by a viper inside the cockpit. A cat placed within the cargo hold. A pair engaging in intimate relations within a bathroom stall. Such scenes remain with the viewer, and they endure because the film trusts the audience to find the comedy in them while sustaining the dread.
| Element | Strength | Weakness |
|---|---|---|
| Premise | Original and absurdly entertaining | Hard to commit to a single tone |
| Samuel L. Jackson | Commanding lead performance | Other characters get short shrift |
| Practical effects | Effective and visible | Overused in the middle stretch |
| Fan reception | Built a real online following | Box office underperformed expectations |
This movie is a guilty pleasure, and it is fully aware of that fact. It has no interest in being a masterpiece, and it would be unreasonable to hold it to such standards. Instead, it aims to amuse you for 105 minutes, and for the most part, it manages to do so.
Get the Notebook.
The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.
