ROBLOX. VIDEO GAMES. MOVIES. ORIGINAL ANIMATIONS.
CLAY TRIBUNE.
Advertisement

The Hangover Review: A Tiger in the Bathroom, a Mystery That Still Works

The Hangover turns a missing groom, a tiger and a trashed Caesars suite into a mystery that never explains itself. A look at why it still works.

By mitch·7 min read
Four disheveled men in suits stand in a trashed hotel room, with a tiger in the bathroom and a baby in the closet.

The wolf pack wakes up in a trashed Caesars Palace suite with no memory, no groom and a tiger in the bathroom. Todd Phillips’ The Hangover turns that premise into the most durable comedy of 2009, and it earns its reputation the hard way: by refusing to explain the joke, and by letting three very different actors carry a mystery that never stops moving.

Trailer, via Warner Bros..

A Tiger in the Bathroom, a Baby in the Closet

Two days before his wedding, Doug Billings (Justin Bartha) drives to Las Vegas with his best friends: Phil Wenneck (Bradley Cooper), a teacher; Stu Price (Ed Helms), a dentist; and Alan Garner (Zach Galifianakis), Doug’s childish future brother-in-law. Doug’s fiancée Tracy (Sasha Barrese) has a father, Sid (Jeffrey Tambor), who lends the group his vintage Mercedes-Benz W111 for the trip. They book a suite at Caesars Palace, sneak onto the hotel rooftop and drink Jägermeister.

Advertisement

The next morning, Phil, Stu and Alan wake up with no memory of the night. Doug is gone. Stu’s tooth is missing. The suite is wrecked. A Bengal tiger is in the bathroom, and a baby is in the closet.

The film’s engine is that image and the question behind it: what happened here? Phillips never lets the audience off the hook with a flashback. The trio retraces their steps, and the movie retraces them too, one bad lead at a time.

Doug’s Mattress on a Statue

The first clues are physical. Doug’s mattress is impaled on a statue outside the hotel. When the trio asks the valet for their Mercedes, he delivers a Las Vegas police cruiser instead. Both details do the same job: they confirm that the night was not a party but an event with consequences, and that the men are now liable for it.

The film’s comedy runs on this gap between what the characters know and what the audience can see. A police cruiser is not a punchline. It is evidence. Phillips treats every strange object as a piece of a case file, which is why the movie holds up as a mystery even when the jokes land hardest.

The Chapel, the Taser and Leslie Chow

At a hospital, the trio learns they were drugged with Rohypnol, which explains the memory loss, and that they came from a chapel the night before. At the chapel, they learn Stu married a call girl named Jade (Heather Graham) — despite his relationship with Melissa (Rachael Harris), who is abusive and unfaithful. Outside, a gang of men ambushes them, demanding to know where “he” is. The trio flees without an answer.

They track down Jade, who turns out to be the baby’s mother. Police arrest them for stealing the cruiser. To get the Mercedes out of impound and earn an early release, they volunteer — unwittingly — as targets for a taser demonstration. Then, driving the car, they find a naked Chinese man named Leslie Chow (Ken Jeong) in the trunk. Chow beats them up and runs.

Each stop adds a name, a debt or a witness. The structure is a chain of obligations, and that is the smartest thing about the script by Jon Lucas and Scott Moore.

Alan Confesses, Mike Tyson Collects

Back at the suite, Alan admits he drugged their drinks. He wanted to guarantee a good night and believed the drug was ecstasy. It is the film’s cleanest turn: the mystery’s cause is not malice but a friend’s clumsy attempt at generosity, and the confession lands as character rather than twist.

Then Mike Tyson appears as himself, knocks Alan unconscious and demands the return of his tiger. The cameo works because the film has already committed to a world where a tiger in a bathroom is a real problem with a real owner. Tyson is not a gag. He is the next creditor in line.

Three Actors, One Real Friendship

The casting is the reason any of this holds. Cooper, Helms and Galifianakis were casual acquaintances before filming, and Helms said that helped build the rapport and chemistry among their characters. He credited Phillips with “bringing together three guys who are really different, but really appreciate each others’ humor and sensibilities.”

Helms also described what the shoot did to the three of them.

As you spend 14 hours a day together for three months, you see a lot of sides of somebody. We went through the wringer together, and that shared experience really made us genuine buddies.

That shared experience shows. Phil is the smug one, Stu is the anxious one, Alan is the one who says the wrong thing at the wrong volume, and the film never asks any of them to be more than that. The trio’s bond is the plot’s real subject, and the search for Doug is the device that keeps it in motion.

Filming took place in Nevada over 15 days. The movie runs 100 minutes.

A Script Rewritten for a Tiger

The origin of the story is almost as strange as the story. Lucas and Moore wrote the script after executive producer Chris Bender’s friend disappeared and ended up with a large bill after being sent to a strip club. The pair sold it to the studio for $2 million. Phillips and Jeremy Garelick then rewrote it, adding the tiger, a subplot involving a baby and a police cruiser, and the role for Tyson.

That rewrite is where the film found its shape. The original premise — a missing friend and a big bill — is a sketch. The tiger, the baby and the cruiser turn it into a machine with three moving parts, each one forcing the characters to act before they understand.

Legendary Pictures and Green Hat Films produced The Hangover, and Warner Bros. Pictures released it on June 5, 2009. It became the tenth-highest-grossing film of 2009, with a worldwide gross of over $467 million, and won the Golden Globe Award for Best Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy. It is the first installment in a trilogy.

What the Movie Gets Right

The Hangover is not a film about Las Vegas. It is a film about the morning after, and about the specific horror of learning what you did from strangers. The tagline — “Some guys just can’t handle Vegas” — undersells it. The problem is not that the guys cannot handle Vegas. The problem is that none of them can remember handling it, and the bill is due before the wedding.

The movie’s restraint is its best quality. It never shows the bachelor party. Every revelation arrives as a leftover: a tooth, a mattress, a cruiser, a marriage license, a tiger. That choice keeps the audience in the same position as Phil, Stu and Alan, which is why the comedy and the mystery do not fight each other.

The weaknesses are real but minor. The film’s treatment of women is thin: Jade is a call girl with a baby, Melissa is a punchline about a bad girlfriend, and Tracy exists mainly as a deadline. The movie is not interested in them, and it shows. The middle section, once the trio starts collecting clues, relies on the momentum of the next weird thing rather than on escalation, and a few stops — the hospital, the impound lot — exist to hand over information rather than to complicate the characters.

The ending is where the film makes its real bet. It does not resolve the night. It shows photographs of it. That decision is the difference between a comedy that explains itself and one that trusts the audience to fill in the worst parts. The Hangover trusts them, and that is why it still works.

Cooper, Helms and Galifianakis each get a clear register, and none of them tries to steal the movie from the others. Bartha’s Doug is absent for most of the runtime and still functions as the engine. Jeong’s Chow arrives late and leaves fast, which is exactly the right amount. Tambor and Barrese do the small work of making the wedding feel like a real obligation rather than a plot device.

The film also understands that a hangover is a physical condition, not a mood. Stu’s missing tooth, the taser demonstration, the punches from Chow and Tyson — the body keeps taking damage, and the comedy keeps coming from the fact that none of it is deserved in any way the characters can name.

Seventeen years of imitators have followed, and most of them copied the wrong thing: the raunch, the cameos, the trashed suite. What they missed is the discipline. The Hangover is a tightly built mystery that happens to be funny, and its jokes come from consequences rather than from shock. It is the rare studio comedy that respects its own premise enough to follow it all the way to the photographs.

7.3 of 10.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.