ROBLOX. VIDEO GAMES. MOVIES. ORIGINAL ANIMATIONS.
CLAY TRIBUNE.
Advertisement

The Proposal” Review: A Competent Vehicle Carried by Bullock and Reynolds”

A review of The Proposal, the Sandra Bullock and Ryan Reynolds rom-com about a forced engagement, its formulaic script, and why the chemistry still works.

By mitch·5 min read
A man and woman sit uncomfortably close on a sofa, a small ring box resting beside them.

“The Proposal” opens with a problem that is not a joke. Margaret Tate, editor-in-chief at a New York City book publisher, is Canadian, and her visa renewal has been denied. Facing deportation, she forces her assistant, Andrew Paxton, into a sham engagement. The tagline sells it as a bribe: “Here comes the bribe…”

That is the engine of the film. Anne Fletcher directs. Peter Chiarelli wrote the script. It runs 108 minutes.

Trailer, via Hulu.

Advertisement

The Green Card Arrangement

Margaret is the boss everyone hates. The film says so plainly: she is universally disliked by her subordinates for her pushy personality. Sandra Bullock plays her. Ryan Reynolds plays Andrew, the assistant who has spent years absorbing her demands.

The deal is ugly, and the movie knows it. Margaret tells Andrew that her deportation would set back his dream of becoming an editor. That is not a request. It is leverage applied by someone with power over his career.

Immigration agent Gilbertson, played by Denis O’Hare, sees through them. He warns that if the marriage is fraud, Margaret will be deported permanently and Andrew will be fined $250,000 and may spend five years in prison. The stakes are stated once, clearly, and then mostly ignored.

Andrew sets his price. Margaret must make him an editor and publish a specific book he has recommended. She agrees.

Sitka, Alaska

The couple travels to Andrew’s hometown of Sitka, Alaska, to meet his parents, Joe and Grace, and his grandmother Annie. Craig T. Nelson, Mary Steenburgen and Betty White play them. The surprise is that the Paxtons are wealthy. Joe owns the family businesses that dominate the town.

At the welcome home party, Margaret meets Ramone, a waiter played by Oscar Nuñez, and Gertrude, Andrew’s ex-girlfriend, played by Malin Akerman. Joe confronts Andrew and accuses him of using Margaret to get ahead. Andrew responds by announcing the engagement to the room.

The next day, Grace and Annie take Margaret to a bar for a bachelorette party. Ramone performs there as an exotic dancer. It is the film’s most sustained attempt at comedy, and it depends entirely on Betty White being game.

Gertrude then tells Margaret something that matters. The night before their college graduation, Andrew proposed to Gertrude. She refused because she did not want to leave Sitka for New York. That refusal left Andrew in New York and put him next to Margaret, though the film never draws that line itself.

A Running Order of What the Trip Delivers

Beat What happens
Arrival Margaret learns the Paxtons are rich
Party Joe accuses Andrew of careerism; Andrew announces the engagement
Bachelorette Grace and Annie take Margaret out; Ramone dances
Gertrude’s talk Andrew’s old proposal to Gertrude is revealed
Parents’ argument Margaret overhears Joe and Grace fighting about Andrew
Confession Margaret tells Andrew about her own life
Wedding plan The family pushes the two to marry the next day

Margaret overhears Andrew’s parents arguing about an ongoing conflict between Andrew and Joe. She asks him about it. He refuses to discuss it. She then confides in him about her own life, and the two grow closer.

That sequence is the whole movie in miniature. The plot needs them to fall for each other, so they do, on schedule, without much resistance.

The family convinces them to marry the following day. The lie has to collapse before the romance can be real. Every romantic comedy built on a false premise runs the same track.

What the Cast Carries

Bullock was nominated for the Golden Globe Award for Best Actress – Motion Picture Comedy or Musical. That nomination is the most credible thing about the production. She plays Margaret without apology, which is the correct choice. A softer version of this character would sink the first act.

Reynolds does what he is asked. Andrew is the put-upon man with a secret ambition and a father he cannot talk to, and Reynolds keeps him likable while the script gives him little to do but react.

The supporting cast is doing heavier lifting than the screenplay. White gets the biggest laughs. Nelson gives Joe a real grievance. Akerman has one scene that carries actual weight, and she lands it.

The screenplay is the problem. Chiarelli’s script sets up a genuine conflict — a powerful woman coercing a subordinate into a crime — and then declines to examine it. The $250,000 fine and the five-year prison threat are introduced and then dropped. Gilbertson exists to be suspicious and then to be satisfied.

The film’s structure is formulaic, and the reviews at the time said so. They praised the performances and the chemistry between Bullock and Reynolds. They criticized the screenplay and the plot. Both halves of that response are correct, and they are not in tension. Chemistry can carry a thin script across 108 minutes. It cannot make the script thicker.

Why the Score Lands Where It Does

“The Proposal” grossed over $317 million worldwide on a $40 million budget. That is a real success, and it tells you what audiences wanted from it. They wanted Bullock and Reynolds in a room together, and they got that.

What they did not get is a movie willing to look at its own premise. Margaret is a Canadian executive who learns she may face deportation because her visa renewal was denied. She is also, by the film’s own account, a boss her staff cannot stand. The movie never asks whether Andrew’s consent is meaningful when his career is on the line. It treats the arrangement as a screwball inconvenience rather than what the source describes: coercion.

That omission is not a small thing. It is the difference between a comedy with a spine and one that borrows a spine for the setup and returns it before the third act.

The Alaskan detour works better than it should. Sitka gives the film a physical place, and the Paxton money gives Margaret something to be wrong about. Her assumption that Andrew comes from nothing is the one prejudice the movie bothers to correct.

Everything else is timing. The bachelorette party, the overheard argument, the confession, the wedding plan — each beat arrives when the genre says it should. Fletcher directs it cleanly. Nothing drags at 108 minutes.

The Proposal is a competent vehicle for two actors who know exactly what they are doing. It is not a good script, and it never pretends to be one for long. The chemistry is the product. The plot is packaging.

The Notebook

Get the Notebook.

The day's best stories and every fresh verdict, in plain English, in your inbox by seven. One email a day, no more.

We send one note to confirm. Every issue has a one-click way out.

Film reviews
Advertisement

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

As an Amazon Associate, Clay Tribune earns from qualifying purchases.